-
Website
http://iowaindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://iowaindependent.com/?p=5627 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
bill4321
19 comments · 25 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 3 points
-
W Scott Lincoln
20 comments · 4 points
-
Netter
30 comments · 1 points
-
rob333
25 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Skinny predicts 2010 campaign will be Gross vs. Vander Plaats
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
Grassley hoping to keep medical marijuana illegal
3 days ago · 4 comments
-
King organizing second rally against health care
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
More deaths in Iowa from H1N1
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Iowa’s drug of choice marijuana, meth
5 days ago · 5 comments
-
Skinny predicts 2010 campaign will be Gross vs. Vander Plaats
1. What major legislation has the Senator sponsored?
2. Explain his association with Rezko, Ayers, etc?
3. How is he going to not raise taxes yet give people who don't pay taxes a tax refund?
4. What has he done as a Senator to bring the "parties" together?
5. Rather then condemn McCain, how would he solve the current financial situation?
Just some questions and if like Chris Matthews said, if you want to feel a "thrill up your leg", consider the potential leaders of this country....Obama the Orator, Biden the Blowhard, Reid the Spineless and Pelosi the Inept....pretty depressing thought, don't you think?
Face the fact: Given the same ideology and political background and past associations and present world situations, if Barack Hussein Obama looked like a caucasian he would not have even gotten through the first half of the democrat primaries (think David Duke). The only explanation for Obama to have gotten this far in this election is that his campaign has used race as an underlying issue.
SHE KNOWS that HER POLITICS (extreme LEFT) is WHAT IS GOING DOWN!
THEREFORE, SHE HAS TO BLAME RACE OR THIS ELECTION BECOMES A REFERENDUM ON HER TOO!!
[Always, always, always, look for WHY a pol does anything! Their words and deeds are for ONE THING ONLY; SELF PRESERVATION! ]
If she admits he is in trouble for being a SOCIALIST; then she will have to defend HER OWN TENDENCIES TOWARD SOCIALISM.
HOWEVER, IF SHE CAN PUT THE REJECTION OF BARACK DOWN TO RACISM, then SHE IS SAFE, and does not have to defend her own SOCIALISM!!!!
For her, RACE HAS TO BE THE ONLY REASON, OR THE ONLY COMPELLING REASON.
On the day after Election Day; the press is going to come to her for a quote; SHE IS GREASING THE SKIDS FOR BLAMING RACISM . . . . . . SO THE PRESS DOES NOT ASK HER THAT SECOND QUESTION.
THAT IS WHY SHE IS STARTING NOW; SHE KNOWS HE CANNOT WIN AND SHE IS NOW PREPARING HERSELF, BY INOCULATING HERSELF FROM THAT SECOND QUESTION!
IS SHE A SNAKE? YOU BE THE JUDGE. IT APPEARS THAT SHE IS BAILING OUT EARLY!
ANGER A CONSERTIVE BY LYING.....................ANGER A LIBERAL BY TELLING THE TRUTH
So.... you must be FURIOUS with Gov. Palin by now!
Actually, I hope she get in the White House and legalizes pot, you know being an enthusiastic marijuana smoker and governor of the only state where it's legal. Staying high all the time would help take the edge off another GOP administration with endless war, economic ruin and shredding the Constitution.
Palin/Marley '08!!!!!!!!!!!
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HAS PASSED ZERO LEGISLATION!!!!!.
THINK OF A DOCTOR WHO NEVER SAW A PATIENT.
A TEACHER WHO NEVER TAUGHT A CLASS.
AN ACTOR WHO NEVER MADE A MOVIE.
A SCIENTIST WHO HAS NEVER DONE ANY RESEARCH.
A BASEBALL PLAYER WHO NEVER HELD A BAT.
AN AUTHOR WHO NEVER WROTE A BOOK, AN ARTICLE, A PLAY, A POEM, OR A GROCERY LIST.
FACT: Obama started in the Illinois Legislature in 1997. By 2005, he was in the US Senate WHERE HE PASSED ZERO LEGISLATION IN 2005, 2006, 2007, AND 2008.
THEN HE BECAME THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT AND SOMEONE GAVE HIM A HOUSEKEEPING BILL IN MAY OF THIS YEAR; AFTER HE WAS ALREADY THE CANDIDATE!!!!!
OBAMA’S first legislation was AFTER he was already the Democrat candidate for president. A SHAM. AN OUTRAGE!!!!
IF A REPUBLICAN TRIED THIS THEY WOULD BE PILLORIED.
BECAUSE HE IS A DEMOCRAT HE IS GETTING AWAY WITH SOMETHING A REPUBLICAN COULD NEVER EVER EVER GET AWAY WITH!!!!!
ASK GOV SIB. IF HE IS ALSO GETTING AWAY WITH THIS OUTRAGE BECAUSE HE IS BLACK!!!!!! (WHAT OTHER REASON COULD THERE BE?)
HOW COULD THE DEMOCRATS NOMINATE A SENATOR WHO HAD NEVER PASSED ANY LEGISLATION???
HOW COULD THE DEMOCRATS THROW HILLARY AWAY FOR A PIECE OF FRAUD WHO HAS DONE ZERO FOR THE PEOPLE??
HE HAS TAKEN MONEY FROM THE FAILING FINANACIAL HOUSES ($885,000.00), BUT DID NOTHING FOR THE PEOPLE ............ LITERALLY NOTHING.
HOW COULD HOWARD DEAN, AND NANCY PELOSI, AND HARRY REID BE SOOOO STUPID????????
Sarah Palin has YEARS of executive experience (Obama has zero, and will never have any as long as he is in the Senate).
Obama had the nerve to say that she was "new to the scene." [He's such a phony American wanna be that he says "hep cat" phrases like "scene."] YET, SHE WAS ELECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN 1992, WHICH IS 5 YEARS BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED TO ANYTHING!!!!
HE IS A PATHETIC LIAR. Yet, the Obama supporters yell "liar" about McCain and Palin.
HE HAS ZERO EXPERIENCE.. Yet, the Obama supporters yell "inexperienced" at Palin.
THAT IS BARACK OBAMA. HE IS A "LEGISLATOR" WHO NEVER, EVER, EVER, AUTHORED ANY LEGISLATION.
This creep was in "politics" about 5 years (WITH ZERO ACCOMPLISHMENTS) when he decided to "publicly seek the presidency" HOW DID HE EVER THINK THAT HE WOULD GET AWAY WITH IT? HOW AND WHY IS HE GETTING AWAY WITH IT?
WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD THINK THAT HE COULD GET AWAY WITH THIS. TALK ABOUT HAVING NO RESPECT FOR THE PEOPLE!!!!! HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR ANYTHING; NOT AMERICA, NOT THE PEOPLE; NOT ANYTHING!!!!! AFTER DOING NOTHING IN THE SENATE FOR HIS ENTIRE TIME THERE (TWO YEARS; 05 AND 06) HE ANNOUNCES FOR THE PRESIDENCY!!!!! HE IS EITHER A CROOK OR A NUT-JOB!!!
http://feingold.senate.gov/~feingold/issues_eth...
I am not sure what you mean by Obama has taken money from the "failing financial houses" but if you mean he has accepted campaign contributions you should also add that so has McCain.
Your candidate has so many problems that a few puny defenses on a blog isn't going to make a hill of beans difference. You are wasting your time; he is a dead cert loser and his house of cards is tumbling worse than today's stock market.
FOCUS: You should be mad as heck at Howard Dean!!! How did ONE MAN get so much power that he could destroy all the other campaigns?????
How did the Democrats ALLOW Howard Dean to pick their candidate.
HOW DID HOWARD DEAN ROLL THE DEMOCRAT PARTY?
What does he get out of the deal? Is this all over "hating Hillary?"
With Hillary, you guys would have been able to complete. This guy is taking you all down AND all the money with him!!!
You should worry about how many millions are going to off-shore accounts for Barry and his ugly wife!!! What did they do to deserve all those millions? Fly around and get their pictures taken? HE EVEN USES A TELEPROMPTER FOR G-d's sake. Talk about LAZY!!
He stuffs his ugly pie hole with free food, takes his shirt off to get the girls going for his scrawny chest, shoots a few hoops, AND HE'S DONE FOR THE DAY! The lazy bum won't even get out on the golf course, or drop a line!
HE TOOK A VACATION IN THE MIDDLE OF A CAMPAIGN, FOR CHRIST SAKE!!! DOESN'T THAT TELL YOU ANYTHING? LIKE RUBE!!! LIKE ARROGANT!!!! LIKE DISRESPECT!!! LIKE LAZY!!! He's a creepy skinny kid who is getting even with the world. He giggles like a girl!!!! He makes me sick; he needs to smack that old lady around and then eat a couple dozen sammiches!!!! And then, go dig a ditch! Get some muscles! Get a workout! Do something other than giggle about movie stars!!!
While trying to enlighten my friends, it would take a lot less breath for me to simply say, "Don't vote for him because he's black" rather than recite the laundry list of reasons Barack Obama should not be President.
No, Governor, I just thought he had a fabulous tan. And your point is....?
“That may be a factor. All the code language, all that doesn’t show up in the polls. And that may be a factor for some people.”
Really, Governor, any particular code in mind?
If Obama wants to win he needs to explain clearly and honestly his relationships with Ayers & ACORN. As an Independent I didn't buy his explanation re: Reverend Wright, he'll need to do better than "I didn't listen to his sermons for 20 years".
You're talking sense here.
PLEASE GO TO DOWNLOADS AT DRDINO.COM THE KING IS COMING
Obama was introduced to the American public as a post racial moderate. His 20 year attendance at Rev. Wright's church and his #1 liberal in the Senate voting record both point to the fallacy of that image.
Will some people not vote for Obama because he is African American, absolutely.
Will some people not vote for McCain because he is "Old", absolutely.
Last time I checked, it was Obama going around practicing agism by saying McCain is too old.
I have not yet heard McCain bring Obama's race into this fight.
People need to get over it. There will always be a segment that will vote because of bigitry. They would have voted for or against Hillary because she was a woman. For those who are not voting because of their bigitry, there are probably just as many voting for them because of that trait.
Admitted you Jew-hating Skin-head thugs.... That's what you are for not supporting Lieberman... You ANTI-SEMITES!!!!
There, how does it feel?
Stop accusing me of being a racist, simply because I disagree with Obama's political views.
I'm glad to see that our nation has a black candidate running for office.
I just wish he was in line with my political beliefs!
The dems have controlled Washington for too long. Bush's biggest errors have been to not veto liberal spending and to allow the liberals to over regulate the mortgage industry. Those regulations have been what have caused the problems that we have today.
Follow the money. Obama has done nothing in the senate to curb the problems. McCain tried, but was blocked by Obama. McCain is not the same as Bush. He has gone against his own party on big issues based on being committed to what he believes. Obama never challenges his party. He is a socialist.
The only racist I have heard in this race have been the libs that believe that you have to vote for the "African-American" you must be racist. That statement itself is racist. Unbelievable and shameful!
Get over yourself! We are sick and da@@ed tired of being beat over the head with the "race/guilt" issue.
If you feel guilty, then by all means vote for Obama!
Supposition: “Race is arguably the biggest issue in this election, and it’s one that nobody’s talking about.”
“Support”: “Time magazine’s Michael Grunwald says race is the elephant in the room.”
Um . . . “nobody’s talking about” it, though.
Governor Kathleen Sibelius of Kansas says racism could cost Obama the White House.
Ahhhh . . . “nobody’s talking about it” . . . I thought.
Philadelphia columnist Fatima Ali warns that, if McCain wins, there will be a “race war.”
But . . . um . . . “nobody’s talking about” about it, right?
Whenever the polls look bad, Obama surrogates come out of the woodwork reminding us that there are nasty racists out there.
And my favorite, lest you forget who the surrogates are Jack Cafferty led with:
“Obama wants to change Washington” But has NEVER done so, not in the entire 150-some-odd non-presidential campaigning days he’s been in the Senate. In fact, not ONCE has he sought to change ANYTHING in politics, except to say he wants to change politics . . . which every politician has said for the last 18 years.
But:
“McCain is a part of Washington and a part of the Bush legacy” . . . except that they HATE each other, and have for years and years, and have been opposed on over a dozen MAJOR issues over the last 8 years.”
Could it be that . . . GASP, we’er voting against the socialist who believes, against every tenet of the founding fathers, that the tax code should be used to redistribute wealth (in his own words), rather than merely support the government, and NOT against the black man?
Just bad luck for us all, I guess, that he’s one in the same.
Considering the fact that, if elected, Obama would be in proximity to the Nuclear Football 24/7, the American electorate has the right to know if Obama has any residual defect from his admittedly heavy former drug use. Obama's inability to overcome his nicotine dependency suggests that he remains vulnerable to such addictions. Obama has the responsibility to submit to an independent medical examination to ascertain the facts concerning his substance abuse.
Until such concerns are put to rest, this man, who has exhibited a profound lack of common-sense, should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office. Greg Neubeck
corporate billion dollar bailouts? Everyone...think....stop voting against your best interests.
taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor..aka redistribution of wealth = socialism
heathcare for everyone (at the same expensive cost mind you)...kinda sounds like communism to me....so as i see it...the entire democratic party has become socialist
Nice try playing the race card, Kathy, but the only telling color about Barack Obama in this race is green. No, not green in the Al Gore do-as-i-say-and-not-as-I-do sense, and not green in the Barbra Streisand come-hobnob-with-the-elite-to-prove-you're-just-plain-folk sense. Green as in inexperienced. 143 days' experience just won't cut it with the American people, and the electorate is too smart to believe the job should go to someone whose only skills are reading a teleprompter well and hooking up with people who can further your career until they become a liability (Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko, etc.). Race-baiting might have worked in other elections, but it won't work in this one.
His every move is right out of radical Sal Alinsky's play book, the father of community organizers. Barak was recruited into community organizing by Sal Alinsky's group. This man, Sal Alinsky, dedicated his book "Rules for Radicals", to as he calls it the first known community organizer, Lucifer. Here is his dedication straight from his book,
"Lest we not forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical:from all our legends, mythology, and history(and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins-or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom- Lucifer"
Alinsky's son, L. David Alinsky , recently confirmed the mentoring of Barak by his father with these comments in the Boston Globe after the DNC convention: “ALL the elements were present: the individual stories told by real people of their situation and hardships, the packed-to-the rafters crowd, the crowd’s chanting of key phrases and names, the action on the spot of texting and phoning to show instant support and commitment to jump into the political battle, the rallying selections of music, the setting of the agenda by the power people.”
“The Democratic National Convention had all the elements of the perfectly organized event, Saul Alinsky style."
Barak wants to create a massive welfare system not decrease taxes! His goal is reparation on the grandest of scales.
These connections and ideologies will be his downfall.
Did you ever think that if there were fewer abortions we wouldn't need all the illegal immigrants to help keep our economy afloat? This woman is a disgrace to Kansas and to women.
The media support of O'Bomber is backfiring though. The good people in the Heartland are not fooled by the elites in the democrat party.
Dems WANT / NEED our economy to collapse (they feel it's good for them politically).
Dems WANT / NEED us to fail in Iraq (they feel it's good for them politically).
Message to Politicians: Just shut up and stop your bickering. You're wasting the American people's time and money. You have forgotten whom you serve. Get off your high horse and start doing your job(s)!!
Sebelius doesn't care that we'll all get higher energy costs because of her. It was ali about her. That's a Democrat for you. We all wish Barack had picked her so we would have been rid of her. Her slogan should be. "Putting Me First!"
Oh, and by the way, we’re not going to vote for Barack because he’s unqualified for the position. He’s the most socialist leaning candidate that we’ve ever had and he wants to increase every tax there is. It has nothing to do with his race, you race baiter. It’s his ideas that suck not him personally.
At a commencement speech at Wesleyan University Obama said,
"You can take your diploma, walk off this stage and chase only after the big house and the nice suits and all the other things that our money culture says you should, But I hope you don't. Fulfilling your immediate wants and needs betrays a poverty of ambition. Our collective service can shape the destiny of this generation, individual salvation depends on collective salvation."
Pretty funny coming from a multi-millionaire who's big time corporate wife apparently hasn't gotten the message yet.
In talking about his national service, Obama, also made this startling statement:
"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? The last time I heard of something like this everybody was in Brown Shirts!!
AND if you recall, this past Monday, there was much ado about Obama and K-12 sex education. That same night Bill O'Reilly scoffed that there was nothing to the story and the bill in question that Obama voted for was nothing more than teaching kindergarten kids about predators. Low and behold on Tuesday both CNN and Fox News displayed the actual text of the bill in question and what do you think it said? Well it said kindergarten kids would be getting sex education, reproductive education and education about aids transmission. Obama called McCain a LIAR for running an add about it, O'Reilly scoffed at it but low and behold when the truth comes out, looks like Obama is the liar!
You want to research Obama you could start here...
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series8.aspx
Sebelius is one very sick, racist puppy. Good luck with her Iowa.
I guess that is just a freedom of mine, isn't it? In the meantime, someone tell Barry to work on his empty record of accomplishments and perhaps he'll garner a few more votes in 16 years or so.
The democrats remind me of a typical 6th grader.:
"Its not my fault. They did it it to me. They are picking on me. "
They should be ashamed of the manner in which Senator Clinton was treated by Obama/Dean dream machine. Hillary will have the last laugh.
Sebelius doesn't care that we'll all get higher energy costs because of her. It was ali about her. That's a Democrat for you. We all wish Barack had picked her so we would have been rid of her. Her slogan should be. "Putting Me First!"
Oh, and by the way, we’re not going to vote for Barack because he’s unqualified for the position. He’s the most socialist leaning candidate that we’ve ever had and he wants to increase every tax that there is. It has nothing to do with his race, you race baiter. It’s his ideas that suck not him personally.
Mark my words, if Obama loses this election, all we will hear about is how he lost simply because of his race.
You can always tell how desperate the Democrats are by how often they play the race card. Looks like they're getting pretty desperate...
I don't see McCain and Palin complaining about all the bad press she is getting because she is a woman. I forget. The bad press is because Governor Palin running for VICE President is more qualified than obama running for President. Now the biased media can't let that go. p.s. I live in Kansas and I could tell you a thing or two about our governor. It's all about big business and to hell with the people. Thank goodness she can't run again.
The exact same reasons why I cannot vote for an opportunist named Barack.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pelosi: Dems bear no responsibility for economic crisis
By Klaus Marre
Posted: 09/16/08 04:14 PM [ET]
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, when asked Tuesday whether Democrats bear some of the responsibility regarding the current crisis on Wall Street, had a one-word answer: “No.”
You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.
You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after 143 days of experience.
You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143 days of experience.
You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.
BUT....
'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.
After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan. 143 days?
We all have to start somewhere. The senate is perhaps a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is - a start.
AND, sadly, a large sector of the American public seems to feel comfortable with this and campaigning for him.
We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are OK with this for the President of the United States of America ?
Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol.
And as someone pointed out earlier - when it comes to politics "like views" more often mean more than "like race". For instance, I'd vote in a heart beat for Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, or Condi Rice. I wouldn't necessarily vote for Colin Powell, however, because he's not conservative enough. It has nothing to do with his race. Likewise, I won't vote for Obama because he's a socialist. That's it. Not because he's black. Heck, as far as I'm concerned he's as white as he is black.
The proposition that over 90% of African-American voters could be supporting Obama simply because he is black suggests she has a point that race could be in play but not in the way that the Obama campaign would prefer to point out. Far be it from Sebelius to be critical of that point if she is going to discuss racial aspects of the election. Question is, why discuss racial issues at all unless the person raising them is looking for a benefit?
In nearly eight years, however, it is notable that her administration has been entirely reactive and has not taken a proactive leadership role with respect to any issue.
Sebelius complacently presides over a state that:
Has some of the worst worker protection laws in the nation.
Has some of the most polluted water in the nation.
Has no usury laws to protect its citizens.
Despite being directly north of Oklahoma (which passed some of the toughest laws against illegal immigration in the nation), has taken no legislative steps to constrain illegal immigration in the state.
Has an education system that is widely desparate and, for the majority of the last 50 years, has largely functioned under court supervision to ensure equality.
Governor Sebelius has done nothing whatsoever with respect to any of the above nor has she taken a leadership position with respect to any other issue that could make the lives of Kansans (who, quite frankly, really don't expect all that much) better.
She's not been a disgrace. But she hasn't actually done much of anything, either.
I'm somewhat shocked, then, to hear Governor Sebelius refer to Obama's race as the reason for the close race, however.
Kansas is staunchly Republican and the majority of people here truly embrace many of the positions of the party of Lincoln - hard work, limited government intervention in the lives of the citizenry (see above), fiscal responsibility and self-sufficiency.
Life in Kansas is hard (no one ever got rich easily here) and "toughness" - both mental and physical - is both regarded and expected. "Bleeding hearts" really just don't have a place here.
Through this lens, it's easy to see why Kansans would vote for John McCain - as the state almost certainly will - without giving any consideration to his skin color.
It's disturbing beyond words, however, to hear a sitting governor suggest that the citizens of her own state are overwhelmingly racist.
Instead of spending all her time campaigning for Obama, perhaps it's time for Sebelius to come home and reacquaint herself with Kansans.
Had Barack been born White there would be no contest, and the time has come where we should be judged not by the color of our skin, but by the contents of our character to quote MLK.
http://obamagetsit.blogspot.com
Lets do this Iowa- together we can change this country and this world.
Gov. Sebelius I am ashamed of you for injecting race betting like most racists. Yes there will be people voting according to their race - on both sides - like 90% of my race voting for Obama. Would you also call them racists? I dare you if you have an ounce of integrity!
This is so third world like where if you are a Kikuyu you vote for the Kikuyu candidate in Kenya. US Politicians - please for the sake of this wonderful country don't start something that will tear this country apart. Unless you see blatant racism stop calling everything racism - you diminish true racism by doing this.
Why? NO DETAILS and he keeps bad company:
"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company." -- George Washington
OBAMA has already shown his distain for the first and second amendments and much more:
1) Pressuring media to NOT permit author's on radio and tv.
2) Multiple attempts to ban guns. "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." -- George Washington
3) Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. -- George Washington
4) Obama wants more government: "Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. "-- George Washington
NOW, you want to know OBAMA'S plan? Just read the news from Venezuela!
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA = HUGO CHAVEZ
To those who love America: SAY NO TO THE MARXISTS! SAY NO TO OBAMA!
As to this article ... the Kansas Governor is probably correct. I just wonder how Iowans can support Obama? I understand how important it is to some folks to 'prove' that they are NOT RACISTS. But, take a second look, IOWA, and visit a ghetto ... then tell me that more government handouts will improve America. It is abundantly obvious that the so-called 'black community' is largely devoid of responsible leadership. Bill Cosby and others like him have it right!
I'd be 100% behind an African-American candidate that shared my values but Obama doesn't come close. Values, experience, character and being able to trust a candidate are what counts, not the color of a person's skin, and Obama doesn't come close in any of those areas compared to the McCain-Palin ticket.
36,000,000 Blacks constitute 12% of the population
27,000,000 Blacks over 18 that can vote
16,000,000 Blacks registered (60%) on paper… including the dead from Chicago
9,600,000 Typically 60% of those registered vote
1,600,000 Subtract all the Blacks that voted Republican in the last election
8,000,000 ALL THE BLACK VOTES OBAMA CAN COUNT ON…
For perspective:
114,000,000 VOTES CAST IN LAST ELECTION WHICH THE REPUBLICANS WON
59,000,000 BUSH’S GOT 51% (WITH A 30% DIS-APPROVAL RATING)
… Kerry only got 48% (54,000,000… only 18% of the population VOTED DEMOCRAT PARTY last time) democrats are so full of themselves, thinking everybody is with them.
Also, Colin Powell (and the others) areREAL AFRICAN AMERICAN BLACKS. Obama is a half white, half African, part Arab, WHO DIDN'T STEP A FOOT ON THIS CONTINENT UNTIL HE WAS 18 YEARS OLD. That is why he "fluffs" so many lines, and says 57 states, and Kentucky is closer to Arkansas than Illinois, and that we are honoring those sitting here today ON MEMORIAL DAY!
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WAS RAISED IN MUSLIM INDONESIA UNTIL HE WAS 10 YEARS OLD. HE DIDN'T COME HERE UNTIL HE WAS 18 and then he lived as an elite college student, and then moved to Chicago to be a "neighborhood organizer" (ala Saul Alinsky the Marxist socialist anarchist) and then joined a Black Liberation Church that follows the teaching of Louis Farrakhan!
OBAMA FLUBS SO MANY LINES THAT HE HAS BECOME A WALKING DISASTER; SO MUCH SO THAT TODAY HIS CAMPAIGN TOOK HIS TELEPROMPTER TO A RODEO IN COLORADO. THAT HAS TO GO DOWN AS THE MOST RIDICULOUS POLITICAL MOVE EVER.
Obama's campaign had the NERVE to mock McCain because he is not familiar or comfortable with a Teleprompter; as though mastering READING ALOUD was a great feat!!!! GOOD SPEAKERS DO NOT NEED TELEPROMPTERS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEIR TOPICS. SMART SPEAKERS DO NOT NEED TELEPROMPTERS BECAUSE THEY CAN THINK ON THEIR FEET. I WOULD MUCH RATHER be clumsy with a teleprompter THAN NEED ONE!!! They owe an apology to McCain (along the ad where they MOCKED his war injuries). Gad but the Obama supporters are a sick, sick, lot. When they lose, worse than Dukakis, they will scream RACISM.
In fact, their candidate will lose because (a) he is a Marxist socialist, (b) he LIES about his background and his record, and (c) his supporters are the most vile humans on the planet. PROOF? LOOK WHAT THEY DID TO HILLARY. THAT IS PROOF OF THEIR SICKENING NEED TO "WIN AT ANY COST."
John McCain said he would rather LOSE an election than hurt America. Obama cannot make that claim SINCE HE TRIED TO DELAY THE TROOPS COMING HOME FROM IRAQ UNTIL AFTER "HIS" ELECTION, SO HE WOULD LOOK LIKE A HERO!!!!
WHY DID THE DEMOCRATS THROW HILLARY OVER FOR THIS AMERICAN HATING PIECE OF FRAUD??? HOW COULD THAT HAPPEN???
Someone should inform the idiot governor that Obama is not part "African-American." He is part "African."
The worst economy in years.
An unpopular war.
So what do the Democrats do? They see their chance and take it. They nominate the most left wing radical extremist since Henry Wallace. And when the little folks say "Not so fast", the likes of Sibelius play the race card. The Democrats will never admit that their selection process and their selection was flawed and out of the main stream. Why can't they do that? that would call for some self reflection and some honesty.
Seems Obama and his stooges simply can't get past raising the race card and trying to blame someone else. A vistim od circumstance.
Clean them all out and save this great nation.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.a...
Dang it. What the heck happened to my Teleprompter?
.
McCain is the one who have all of the above.
The ONLY reason ObaMarx is on the ballot is because he is black. Democrat masters use blacks on their political plantation.
Say no to the ObaMarx style of socialist government!
THE WORLD WILL NOT COME TO AN END IF YOU VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T LOOK LIKE YOU PEOPLE. Trust me, we've been doing it all our lives. :)
I say "Have you noticed that Barack Obama is 100% liberal Democrat?"
That's his problem.
America is READY for a Black President just as it is ready for a Woman President or a Chinese President or a Japanese President, Mexican, Italian, Irish, Polish, Jewish, Arab or what ever.
Just NOT this Black Man, Obama, or that Woman, Hillary.
Given Obama’s history, a young white mother who rebelled from her Middle American roots and sought out anti-American philosophies to express herself. Having Barrack from a Non-American Black Muslim Man with a Socialist political mindset was the fulfillment of her rebellion.
To my mind Obama has done nothing in his life to redeem his American roots, Communists, Socialists, Muslims, Black Liberation Socialists (if God is not for the Black man and against the White man then God must be killed) and radical homegrown terrorists all make up the bulk of Obama’s long term relationships.
Hillary’s resume is a bit more conventional but no less radical at it’s core.
Until the American Blacks turn their backs on the likes of Obama, Jackson, Sharpton and learn to Hitch their Hopes on the likes of, Powell, Rice, Thomas, Sowell, Williams, Swan and such I afraid the refrain of ‘Not this One’ will be repeated.
Obama's candidacy spotlights the divide between native black culture and African immigrants.
By Louis Chude-Sokei
February 18, 2007
ALTHOUGH NOT quite able to pass for white, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has been able to pass for African American. He is biracial, but not white; black, but not African American; American but not African. What has entranced the country more than his somewhat vague policies is Obama's challenge to conventional racial and cultural categories.
http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:JOqie76mC0A...
Hey Barack is going to have problems because he a LIBERAL. Clinton at least knew how to play to the center, but Barry is a LIBERAL. He is not a real person, but a collection of LIBERAL aspirations that shoots hoops.
I'm voting for the white guy.
Then stick to the issues! What part of the name President BUSH is Nominee McCAIN? Are they one and the same individuals? No. So stop derailing voters into thinking that McCain is a shadow or a clone of President Bush. Senator McCain is his own person and has a voting record of his own - reaching across party lines and spending $.00 of pork barrel money. Check out Obama's record of pork barrel spending. He and Hillary are at the top of wasteful spending.
Voters don't be pursuaded simply by the media and another's words. Check out the nominee's character, experience AND voting records! Don't forget to check out Obama's associations with anti-American affiliates.
Clearly, one can tell the writer of this article's political preference. The lead character is a politician, yet her party's name was surgically removed to help give the racial tag a ubiquitous edge that does not exist. Cheap, very cheap journalism.
I read in your article Sebelius: Obama’s race ‘may be a factor’ the paragraph
“Have any of you noticed that Barack Obama is part African-American?” Sebelius asked in response to a question about why the election is so close. “That may be a factor. All the code language, all that doesn’t show up in the polls. And that may be a factor for some people.”
I am wondering why it was scrubbed from the original which read:
“Have any of you noticed that Barack Obama is part African-American?” Sebelius asked with sarcasm. “(Republicans) are not going to go lightly into the darkness.”
She made racist accusations. Why was it necessary to remove that? Why would you cover for her?
She also asserts: "All the code language, all that doesn’t show up in the polls. And that may be a factor for some people.”
Yet she offers absolutely no evidence. Isn't some sort of evidence for assertions of racism important to you, especially coming from a Governor?
http://www.calebgrace.com
He is VERY dangerous ..... Please research these candidates for your self ....
More videos about Obama right here :
http://www.youtube.com/user/StudentsofAmerica
http://www.youtube.com/user/VetsForFreedomVideo
Unreal ..... How Obama has made it this far is scary and his party is showing their true colors ....
Please research the TRUTH before you VOTE in November !!!!!
and thanks to chris for this post ......
>What do the top ten cities with the highest poverty rate "all" have in
> common? Answer: Democrat leadership.
>
>
> Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican
mayor since 1961;
>
> Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;
>
> Cincinnati, OH (3rd)... since 1984;
>
> Cleveland, OH, (4th)... since 1989;
>
> Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
>
> St. Louis, MO (6th).... since 1949;
>
> El Paso, TX (7th) Has never had a Republican Mayor;
>
> Milwaukee, WI (8th)... since 1908;
>
> Philadelphia, PA (9th)... since 1952;
>
> Newark, NJ (10th)... since 1907.
>
> It is the disadvantaged who habitually elect Democrats,
> yet are still disadvantaged ... hmmm...make you wonder?
Does anymore REALLY need to be said ????????
How does that happen? By voting against minimum wage increases 19 times like McCain?
By cutting subsidies for food and housing?
By diverting vast proportions of public funds toward law enforcement and prisons rather than education?
I'd like you to do some research yourself. You will find that the vast majority of poor people in America are white people. Poor white people live in rural areas that tend to be more socially conservative, therefore many of them are republican. Although many Blacks are social conservatives, a lack of decent education is a huge factor in poverty. You are really hurting folks on this site who are trying to say that race isn't an issue in this election. Were you even born in the 90's when more people were lifted out of poverty since the passing of the New Deal. Who was is the White House then? How did it happen? Was it socialism? Was it the trickle down economics that McCain is advocating? How has "W" done at lifting people out of poverty and providing ecomomic opportunities for Americans? I don't care if you are democat or republican, you have to be a little insulted by this ridiculously flimsy anaoly between democratic leadership and poverty. Democrats don't creat poor people, poor people create democrats.
Barrack Hussein Obama is really "tan". Which means he cannot be or be "oreo". So, I think the best color from the color pallet would be "green". In case you Democrats don't get "green" I'm talking about inexperienced.
Obama is "green" and he proves every day on the campaign trail by: 1. not picking Hillary for VP, 2. picking blowhard Biden, 3. insulting millions of older voters with the McCain can't emial ads, 4. with "Uh", "Mmmm", "Huh", "Duh", 5. throwing his white grandmother under the bus, 6. claiming to be related to Wild Bill Cody, 7. being for his tax increases before he is against them, 8. being against the surge in Iraq and still being against the surge in Iraq even if it is working, 9. saying 95% of people under his presidency will get a tax cut financed by the other 5%, etc, etc ----------------------
I'm getting tired so I'm gonna quit and vote for McCain even if he is "white" .
Former Republican House majority leader Dick Armey recently told USA Today, while in St. Paul at the Republican National Convention. Armey enlightened us all with this gem: "There's an awful lot of people in America, bless their heart, who simply are not emotionally prepared to vote for a black man."
Is that something close to "green"?
Liberals have been saying for years that conservatives "hate blacks" and "fear strong women." Bullsh1t! Minorities with conservative principles (Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Condoleeza Rice, Janice Rogers Brown, Colin Powell, J.C. Watts and MANY others) are welcome, although the "tolerant" liberal establishment castigates them as "Uncle Toms" and "not authentically black."
As for strong women, how about Sarah Palin, Condoleeza Rice (again), Jeane Kirkpatrick, Elizabeth Dole, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Elaine Chao, Margaret Spelling, and others. Of course, if they don't approve of unfettered abortion for any reason, the National Organization for (liberal) Women sasy they're not "really" in tune with women's issues; of course the media laps it up, even though NOW is tiny (MAYBE 150,000 members in a country of 300+ million) an is scarcely representative of mainstream opinion.
The Democrats can whine about racism and sexism (Hillary may have been criticized because of her policies, but didn't see one-tenth the actual sexist comments Palin has endured), but until they take a look in the mirror and see that they do NOT represent America, they're going to continue to get 9% approval ratings. Trying to get to a majority by wrangling a coterie of competing interest groups is like herding cats; you can keep it up for a while, but eventually they go their own way. Better to determine what's actually best for the COUNTRY (what a concept!) and govern that way.
If you want to prove you're not prejudice, you don't have to vote for Barrack, just come up with an argument that isn't based on blatent lies. If you can find evidence that the soldiers who have died in Iraq are not disproportinately minority, I will apologize. The representation of Blacks in our combat forces are 43% more than what is found in the general population. As early as 1983 Blacks represented 33% of the Army. That's a lot of Orderlys and mess cooks you peice of________.
Although obviously not represented on this site, the majority of Amercians are sick of the lies. Why lie? Make your point with facts and don't assume everyone you're speaking to is as ignorant as you are.
Or, maybe Barrack Hussein Obama wants to run against a woman instead of the experienced, decorated war hero, and patriot, John S. McCain, who has never requested an earmark (Obama has requested almost $1 Billion). Most women can definitely be subdued the usually stronger man. But your man, Barrack Hussein Obama, might have a problem doing that with Governor Palin -- she's tough.
Or, maybe your man is weak.
Keep it up "teale" and step into some more of your own B.S.!!!!
Please explain what your point is here.
In light of the fact that Kansans will almost certainly vote overwhelmingly for John McCain, it's disturbing beyond words to hear our governor publicly represent us as overwhelmingly racist.
I suppose the next thing I will hear is the governor of Kansas publicly describing its citizenry as bitter, gun-toting, religion-clinging bowlers.
God help me, I'm agreeing with Geraldine Ferraro!
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-...
Don't believe me though...I quote from this site that explains her position well: "http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/05/26/novak-brands-kathleen-sebelius-vice-president-abortion"
"Last year, she vetoed a bill requiring explicit medical reasons for a late abortion, and she vetoed other abortion legislation in 2006, 2005 and 2003.
Those positions are necessary for Democratic politicians to pass their party's pro-choice litmus test, but Sebelius's connection with abortion is more intimate. She is allied with the aggressive Kansas branch of Planned Parenthood in a bitter struggle with antiabortion activist District Attorney Phill Kline. There is substantial evidence she has been involved in what pro-life advocates term "laundering" abortion industry money for distribution to Kansas Democrats. Kansas is the fiercest state battleground in the abortion wars, making Kathleen Sebelius the national pro-choice poster girl."
OK, folks, pro-choice as in "you haven't had a baby shower for your child yet, so should you go ahead and kill him/her because you would rather go ahead and get a new/used car this year and have a baby later."
Please, before believing this person is a moderate as suggested by Dems everywhere, check the facts like who, of all organizations, threw her a huge birthday bash as if it was a best friend (Planned Parenthood). Speaking of planned parenthood, many of you may not have heard the actual recordings of investigators calling the donation number and asking that their donation be used specifically for African American children's abortions which was greeted by complete compliance by the operator taking the call....even gleefully. Not once, not twice, but still even. Call them yourself, ask the same question...see what happens. Gov. Sebelius spent her birthday with these murderers! Sebelius does not speak for Kansas AT ALL. She did NOT run on the platform in the least and this has all been really secret until lately. KS citizens are absolutely shocked by all of this. Kansas, and I'd like to think Iowa as well, would never give any creedence whatsoever to this monster.
Sadly INTOLERANCE and BIGOTRY is still a factor in the United States, but it defines many on left or in the Democrat party. These factors, along with Senator Obama's lack of experience (as cited by Joe Biden and the Clintons during the primary) is what will lead to a McCain-Palin victory in November.
I grew up in a very religious family. Our parents exposed us to the gospel of Jesus Christ so that when we were old enough to make CHOICES in our lives, we would choose the right path. Do CAN NOT legislate morality, and you will not stop abortions by making it illegal no more than you'll stop Cocain use by making it illegal. What you will do is put the health and safety of a lot of American women in Jeopardy. The US will never join the other 3 countries on earth (I beleive Malta, El Salvador, Chile) in banning abortion. Get over it. It's not going to happen. As a society, we are not in anyway prepared to handle the consequences of what happens to a child born to people who should never be parents. And please save me the Adoption story as well. Orpanages are teeming with minority children who were born to parents who tried to do the right thing. Now unlike white children, there is no demand for these kids. The American taxpayer is paying for this!
The answer lies in preventing unwanted pregnacies by any means necessary. The hypocrasy that exists in the notion that government should stay out of my wallet but are free to tell my wife, daughter, sister what to do with her body is stifling. Abortion in this country will end when we get back to the business of changing hearts as oppose to changing laws.
In general, McCain's judgement is sound.
If no one had "noticed that Barack Obama is part African-American," he wouldn't be getting 90% of the African-American vote, the millenial nitwits wouldn't think it "cool" to vote for a Chicago pol with no experience, the guilty white pinheads wouldn't be doing penance, and Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee for POTUS.
I'm voting for the 100% white guy.
Obama even said that it is not to be accorded an abortion survivor the rights of a person.
Obama and Biden will lose because of their anti-God principles.
Obama Bin Biden = Terrorists of the Unborn
He's been running on this for 19 months now. Oh, and if you disapprove of his socialist ideas or his crazy friends (did he really think people would forget about Jeremiah Wright?) they're going to call you a racist. It's so easy.
And I say that as a non-American observer. I just can't believe that the American people have allowed themselves to be manipulated by those tactics. Surely I hope Americans are not dumb enough to believe that you could spend 20 years in an institution without noticing how hateful it is.
I M voting 4 the 100% white McCAIN...does that make me a racist????
I M not voting 4 him BECAUSE he's white...I M voting 4 him because he's STRONG and won't tahe NO S**T from no EUROTRASH
facts told BO wouldn't even be known outside his CHITOWN ward if he wasn't HALFRICAN-AMERICAN
Remember folks, this is the same tactist they employ against the Clinton's during the primary in order to draw black voters away from her; where any comment the Clintons made all of a sudden -- became a racist comment -- even, comparing Obama to Jesse Jackson. Now they are trying to use Race as a guit phenom for white Americans while ignoring the fact that blacks are voting for Obama at a record 95%!..... but heck, black people are not racist, they are just voting for one of their own for the first time. rt?
This year we have a choice and the choice will prove whether we are a progressive nation or regressive.....Can we move beyond or will we be boomerranged back to the 1950's by an lying old man and a woman with few qualifications...We will end up the continued laughstock of the World or present the opportunity for change...
I think the youth of this great nation will decide for those that hide their racism behind excuses...
We will see!
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
Perhaps she and her liberal friends could get off the hate band wagon and discuss policy, ideas, and the future potential of this country rather than bashing their opponents relentlessly and claiming the people of this nation are regressive racists if they don't elect her chosen candidate.
You, are EXACTLY what is wrong with this country today. The partisan bitterness that you clearly display divides this country.
Born and raised a dem, voting for McCain in November. John, don't buy into the bitterness. Stay the man you have always been. Rise above the radically liberal hollywood nastiness and show this country what someone with your experience, and a non-lawyer everyday person like your Vice President can accomplish on behalf of the people.
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
My question is; Is the youth of this great nation paying attention? --- I guess, We will see!
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
1. Sen Obama is the most fervent supporter of abortion rights in the country, being the only legislator in the country to vote against the verbage of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, as an Ill senator.
2. His economic plan is based on Robin Hood, take from the rich and give to the poor. That is not a means by which we can stimulate growth in the economy to overcome the huge debt left by President Bush and the Democratic Congress. If want to balance the budget we have to get America to work, and handouts don't get people working.
3. He has publically stated that he will cut military spending, stop development and deployment of the Missle Defese System, and reduce the Future Combat Systems program. With Russia getting more bellicose and the continued threat from Muslim radicals this is no time to show weakness.
4. His Universal Health Care program is completely socialist in nature. We need to develop a means to care for those who need it, not put everyone in to a government run program run by people who get paid the same regardless of the results. 30 years in the Army, I know about government run health care.
I could go on, but I think my point is made. It is what he believes, not the color of his skin that causes me not to vote for hiim. I believe that that is what the majority of these respondants are saying.
One last note. You stated that America is the laughing stock of the world. From that I deduce you haven't been around much. If we are so bad, then why are so many people still imagrating to America? If you are so ashamed of America, why don't you donate your citizenship to someone who will do something with it other than complain about how terrible we all are? Let me know when you find a better country in which to live. I won't be holding my breath.
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.pas.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=j...
Obama is an ARAB-American. Obama hopes people don't find this before he is elected.
Do a search, like I did, "Obama Arab-American" and find
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs...
Obama is 50% white, 43.75% ARAB and 6.25% black according to his ancestry.
I can't wait until I get a chance to vote HER out of office.
McCain/Palin '08!!
White 74.65%
Latino or Hispanic 10.67%
Black 9.56%
Others 5.12%
Hero's all.
Obama is an ARAB-American. Obama hopes people don't find this before he is elected.
Do a search, like I did, "Obama Arab-American" and find
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs...
Obama is 50% white, 43.75% ARAB and 6.25% black according to his ancestry.
Considering the fact that, if elected, Obama would be in proximity to the Nuclear Football 24/7, the American electorate has the right to know if Obama has any residual defect from his admittedly heavy former drug use. Obama's inability to overcome his nicotine dependency suggests that he remains vulnerable to such addictions. Obama has the responsibility to submit to an independent medical examination to ascertain the facts concerning his substance abuse.
Until such concerns are put to rest, this man, who has exhibited a profound lack of common-sense, should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office. Greg Neubeck
a dean of admissions at a U.S. medical school state the above requirement. However if you were female, you would need at least a 3.0. And if you were a black female, you would need at least a 2.5. He didn't happen to state what the minimum would be for a black male???). I say all of this to simply state that we all face obstacles and it is all too easy to play the victim. Hard work and honesty will trump most obtstacles one faces!
Before one jumps to the conclusion I'm voting for McCain because he's white, let me assure you that nothing could be farther from the truth. I'm voting for him because he's quasi conservative and Obama is very liberal.
Like another poster, I look forward to voting for a black conservative such as Steele, Watts, etc.
that it was a few traditionally blue states(dems/northern libs that deserted) that did him in.
WHY NORTHEASTERN LIBS COULDN'T POSSIBLY BE RACIST...................................COULD THEY???
Among black voters: 93% difference between the candidates
YOU tell ME where the racism is, madame governor?
Clean them all out and save this great nation.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.a...
Sebelius, was considered to be on the final short list for VP by the Obama campaign. She wasn't considered equal to be choosen as VP, over a man. Yet, good enough by the Obama campaign to go out and"sweep" or clean up female voters. Gov.Sebelius can have policy disagreements with Sarah Palin the #2 on McCain's ticket. However, her attempt to distance herself from Gov. Palin in her comments is unbelievable and smacks like politics as usual!
Searchin4Truth mentions: >Obama is an ARAB-American. Obama hopes people don't find this before he is elected.<
quebec points out: >Governor Sebelius statement that Obama is part African -American is a mistake. His father is African but not an American. Obama is part African.<
Detroit4McCain (whose post seems to have disappeared from this board) stated something about Obama being an Africaned-American.
Isn't a spot-on observation that these comments - and others - seriously question the "American" part of the hyphenated-label, where this American will be voting for the best representative of an American come this November....
pick. Gov. Palin is, I'm sure, a good person but she is Gov. of the richest (top 10) and lest populated (bottom2)
states in the union. No foreign policy experience and little experience with our nations poor and underpriviledged hoards.
I have read article and listen to black columnist telling us that if Obama does not win it is because we are a racist country and there will be rioting and race wars to pay for. This is really an uncivilized response to a situation that you can never confirm.
I myself am voting for McCain because as I said he is about as close to conservative that I can get in this race. I am waiting for J.C. Watts to run and he will get my vote and I think at that time you will see who’s really racist.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
jjobrien714@gamail.com
ken the karate kid and proud irishman!
1) Obama is very liberal-leaning, is it so shocking that this would polarize voters? Not everyone out there is liberal-leaning!
2) Obama has 143 days of actual job experience. What company would let someone with only 143 days experience run the company. At McDonald's or Starbuck's he wouldn't even be allowed to manage a store let alone the whole company. At least Hillary had real experience.
All the Obama supporters are now pulling out the race card. The Media is playing along too, CNN says today that Obama means "change" so you're racist if you don't vote for him. They say nothing about Obamas own pick for the Presidency in-waiting, Joe Biden, a career politician from Washington DC with a Lobbyist son. We are supposed to believe Obama and elect him, a Chicago politician with no experience, yet Obamas choice is an old school career politician from Washington DC with a Lobbyist son? So that's the kind of "change" we must except... or we're racist?
http://timesonline.typepad.com/uselections/2008...
You actually suggest that (R-conservative) J.C. Watts will beat (D-liberal) Hillary (again?) in 2012? Delicious thought! He has my vote.
A concerned voter in Washington State
1. He is the most liberal Dem in Congress and will tax us into a depression. The country generally doesn't go for either extreme.
2. His resume is thin, to say the least. If he were white, Hillary is the candidate and next president. Period.
3. You can't tell Middle America you care about them to their face and then bemoan their "clinging to their guns and religion" when speaking to the SF elite. People remember that and will take their revenge on election day.
4. Not taking public funds, Ba Ba Streisand fund raisers, I'll talk to Iran, I won't talk to Iran, etc. reveals he is just another empty political suit trying to sell us something called "change".
I think he is toast.
Insults those who "cling to their guns and religion."
Gotta be his race.
Spends 20 years soaking up the wisdom of an American hating, Marxist theology spreading demagogue.
Gotta be his race.
Gets blown away in his first face-to-face with McCain at Saddleback.
Gotta be his race.
Has a resume thinner than a binging-purging supermodel.
Gotta be his race.
Abandons pledge to accept public funding.
Gotta be his race.
Abandons pledge to do town halls with McCain.
Gotta be his race.
Abandons his message of post-partisan unity.
Gotta be his race.
Picks the inconsequential, long-winded Joe Biden while ignoring Ms. 18-million Votes Hillary.
Gotta be his race.
His opponent makes a pick that fires up the base and ignited a cultural phenomenon, all while saying, "Hey, Hillary voters...over here we don't shrink from powerful women."
Gotta be his race.
Says question about life and human rights is above his pay grade.
Gotta be his race.
Gets sweetheart home deals thanks to convicted crook.
Gotta be his race.
Partnered with, worked for, made first political foray in the home of a terrorist.
Gotta be his race.
Wants to raise all sorts of taxes, hang with all sorts of dictators and run from Iraq.
Gotta be his race.
Parties with Streisand and other leftist Hollywood glitterazzi at $30,000 a pop.
Gotta be his race.
Yeah, the polls are close and Obama's fading, governor, because of the color of his skin. And Elvis is preparing to sabotage voting machines in Ohio.
It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.
~Robert F Kennedy~
Here is a quick list of B. Hussein's anti-American connections:
1) Sal Alinksy, the father of community organizers who dedicated his book "Rules for Radicals" to Lucifer.
2) Tony Rezko - Rezko and several others were indicted on federal charges in October 2006, for using their connections to the state boards to demand kickbacks from businesses that wanted to do business with the state. Obama has since identified over $250,000 in campaign contributions to various Obama campaigns as coming from Rezko or close associates, and has claimed to have donated almost two thirds of that amount to charity.
3) ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) - ACORN is at the heart of one of the most massive voter fraud campaigns in American history. ACORN is intimate with Barack Obama and is a major supporter of unions throughout the country and is doing its level best (and illegally at that) trying to assure that Obama wins this election. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is also reporting that the Obama campaign has been forced to amend a report to reflect over $800,000 of previously unreported ACORN donations to his campaign.
There are more but I do not have the time.
But to use your quote: "It is what it is."
The point is that American (U.S.) voters will be going to the polls to select the party and its candidates to lead their America, however they perceive it. Blacks will be heavily for BHO (for aforementioned reasons) and Whites will predominately lean for McCain it so appears. Those are also called "demographics" which can be found in Wikipedia http://www.wikipedia.org/
If people choose to vote [for] their race, agenda, ethnicity or agendas, fine. I will be simply voting for that American-qualified representative who best defines my standards of leadership.
Be ever vigilant in the future because more of this is coming to the United States, if we can hang onto being a sovereign nation.
John McCain was born to two Americans in a U.S. territory (Panama) but outside the U.S. also. Schwartzenegger was born in Austria but is governor of Calif., and toyed once with having Congress "bend" natural born citizenship requirements for a presidential run.
All the more (most) confusing is insistence of gov't & society to implement the hyphenated American designation of affirmative action when it was the report's conclusion (during the LBJ admin) by its chair, Black Congresswoman (D-TX) Barbara Jordan, that the "problem with America is that there are too many hypenated Americans."
She stated the obvious: that it was no longer a melting pot but a divided nation of multiple races and ethnicities all with their own special interests/agendas that was tearing the country apart.
So, I stand by the quoted quote: "It is what it is."
Thank you for your missive, and I hope you learned from the reply.
The United States of America had better start enforcing its Constitution and laws, or we will really lose this country to anyone who demands the office because they are "USA American".
The black American, under the Barbara Jordan Commission findings, was given the African-American designation to identify those blacks who were Americans in the United States Census Records. Of course, we know that anyone who adopted the 14th Amendment at birth, anchor babies, and others, from other countries of the world, identified African-American, if considered, black. The other carribean persons, notably, those who spoke other than English language, had only white, black, Asian, other to check on this U.S. Census before the change to "hispanic". Cubans checked "white", Mexicans wanted and checked "white" but some were "black" or dark skinned. Others, mostly spanish-speakers, checked "other". They also demanded inclusion as a "minority" on the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, reenacted in 2007. And, you can thank an executive order that was never rescinded, for the continuation of push 1 for English.
This division, in order to get some type of preferential treatment by government, given to black Americans and used by anyone else, is not helping those intended, because the media, the government and those who want to get over and take over in the U.S.A., do not want to examine and tell the truth!
I researched known web sites for the United States of America citizenship of Obama, Sr. Another board messenger, who appeared to have legal knowledge, stated outright that Obama, Sr. was not a United States citizen. When Obama, Jr. was born, it was published in a number of papers because Hawaii which was a state (admitted 1959), with its convoluted citizenship process, had listed Obama, Jr. as caucasian while the father was listed as "African". Our question at that time, knowing the U.S. Census, was how he, Obama Jr., would identify himself, later in life. While he identifies as African-American, census records, he is Kenyan of Arab descent, and born to an USA American mother.. He is not natural born, because his father was Kenyan (African) and did not take the oath of United States citizenship and his mother was American. Both parents must be United States citizens to be considered "natural born". Most USA blacks are mixed with similar
DNA, as well, but are Americans, first. In other words, Black By Nature, American By Choice!
I hope this clarifies this for you. Do not put it pass Congress to pass a law to correct this. That is why we have all senators running for POUS with other known senators pushing this!
The United States of America had better start enforcing its Constitution and laws, or we will really lose this country to anyone who demands the office because they are "USA American".
The black American, under the Barbara Jordan Commission findings, was given the African-American designation to identify those blacks who were Americans in the United States Census Records. Of course, we know that anyone who adopted the 14th Amendment at birth, anchor babies, and others, from other countries of the world, identified African-American, if considered, black. The other carribean persons, notably, those who spoke other than English language, had only white, black, Asian, other to check on this U.S. Census before the change to "hispanic". Cubans checked "white", Mexicans wanted to check "white" but some were They also demanded inclusion as a "minority" on the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, reenacted in 2007. And, you can thank an executive order that was never rescinded, for the continuation of push 1 for English.
This division, in order to get some type of preferential treatment by government, given to black Americans and used by anyone else, is not helping those intended, because the media, the government and those who want to get over in the U.S.A., do not want to examine and tell the truth!
I researched known web sites for the United States of America citizenship of Obama, Sr. Another board messenger stated outright that Obama, Sr. was not a United States citizen. When Obama, Jr. was born, it was published in a number of papers because Hawaii which was a state (admitted 1959), with its convoluted citizenship process, had listed Obama, Jr. as caucasian while the father was listed as "African". Our question at that time, knowing the U.S. Census, was how he, Obama Jr., would identify himself, later in life. While he identifies as African-American, census records, he is Kenyan of Arab descent, and born to an USA American mother. He is not natural born, because his father was Kenyan (African) and did not take the oath of United States citizenship and his mother was American. Both parents must be United States citizens to be considered "natural born". Most USA blacks are mixed with similar DNA, as well, but are Americans, first.
In other words, Black By Nature, American By Choice!
Do not put it pass Congress to pass a law to correct this. That is why we have all senators running for POUS with other known senators pushing this!
Amen brother..
Palin linked electoral success to prayer of Kenyan witchhunter
http://timesonline.typepad.com/uselections/2008...
than come back and say that your objective enough to say that she's a true American...
At least John McCain showed up on his job site (Washington, DC) to cast an actual vote that represented his constituency. Moreso than Jane-o.
Would you make a mailroom clerk at Microsoft for 143 days Bill Gates' replacement?
Would you make an attorney a supreme court justice 143 days after passing the bar?
Would you take an artist who is 143 days removed from art school and ask him/her to restore the Sistine Chapel?
Would you take a US Senator who has 143 days experience and make him president of the United States of America? Oh yeah, according to the Loony Left, it must be his race.
Katherine Baber
FOUND ROOTS
P.O. Box 7713
Cotati, California(510) 798-7921
skatkat1@msn.com
A Nation without knowledge of its History is like a tree without Roots. - Marcus Garvey
Another thing. RACISM is in the DNA of the worldview of this country. There is nothing anybody can do to change that. Racism is interwoven into the very way we think. It is unfortunate that you are blind to that. Help yourself and look deep into your heart and tell yourself---YOU ARE RACIST!
Katherine Baber
FOUND ROOTS
P.O. Box 7713
Cotati, California(510) 798-7921
skatkat1@msn.com
A Nation without knowledge of its History is like a tree without Roots. - Marcus Garvey
And what about McCain's cronies? He is in bed with so many crooks and crazy preachers. I swear, you of you bible-thumping, so-called Americans, are all going to meeting each other in Hell.
It is this continuing charge from Obama's followers that are turning people off, and I see that his friends at CNN are not making the same stupid claim.
Why can't it be that Obama has no experience, is extremely liberal and maybe the country doesn't want the three branches of government under the control of one party.
The real question, as others , like "Independentinsandiego" pointed out, is the SHADY COMPANY that OBAMA KEEPS. I agree that anyone who chose such a divisive, hate-filled spirtual pastor like Jeremy Wright raises eyebrows. Remember: If the Hillary Clinton team hadn't got ahold of Jeremy Wright's race bating church speeches, Obama would still hold him up in high esteem...Throw in Bill Ayers who was part of "Weather Underground" and blew up governmnet buildings in the U.S. and you have a home grown terrist he is buddies with.
In 2001 Ayers admitted (to the NY Times) that he wished he had blown up more buildings! So, why won't Obama denounce his relations with such people? Why isn't the media asking these questions? There are other extremists that Obama hangs out with. Perhaps the worst part of all is that Obama will lead us closer to Socialism.... Is that what America wants? I don't think so.
As far as Obama like Biden they make a corkscrew look straight.
The reason you may lose your job at DHL is because your company sucks. I used you guys at my company for almost 12 years then just last year you went from being the cheapest to the most expensive with no improvement in service. Now you guys don't even deliver to the whole country anymore. Wouldn't you expect your customers to leave you? Stop blaming somebody else for you problem. Get on your management for making bad business decisions. UPS and FedEx are eating your lunch because they offer a better product (service) at a better price. You are delusional if you think John McCain is somehow responsible for your companies failures. And you are completely nuts if you think Obama's economic policies are the better choice to improving your job outlook or personal finances. His tax policy (for one) is a disaster waiting to happen.
I GUESS SHE HASN'T HEARD THE LATEST...'''''ITS THE WOMEN STUPID'''''
New headline: "Governor Sebelius feels racist Democrats and Independents will elect McCain over Obama"
Slavery was ended in the US 143 years ago by a white President and a half a million white Union soldiers who died for the privilige. I lived through the sixties and the Jim Crow laws were eliminated fourty years ago. Since then, Barack, Michelle, Oprah, Tiger, Michael, Condi, Colin and a host of other Americans have shown that the US not only has learned to accept diverse Americans but embraces them. The fact that Barack drew as many votes as HC proves race will not be the deciding issue.
Do you know the number one factor that sets winners of any race, creed or gender apart from losers? Victimization. Ask a psychologist on getting people back to being productive and functional and they'll tell you they have to stop being a victim.
If Tiger dosen't sink a putt, he loses. He doesn't scream racism. Barack chose politics and he has been very successful to date but if he doesn't win in the political game it's his own d**n fault, period!
Shouldn't it be sheepish? It never ceases to amaze me that people buy into they line "I'm only going to raise someone else's taxes". Don't you remember Bill Clinton's(Campaign..........say anything to get elected) pledge to give the middle class a tax cut? "I worked harder than I've ever worked in my life and I just couldn't give you that tax cut"
Next time the Ds need to pick a better, stronger, more moderate candidate. They need to get back in touch with their core. The governor is throwing the race card in a sad attempt to fix a sinking ship. Better luck in 2012
Is it his pigmentation or his pigmentality....
Ot seems the ground work is being laid right now.
I have no issue with his race - it is his lack of qualifications to lead that I don't like. As a Republican I would have voted for Hillary against McCain as I don't see much difference in them policy wise; the first female President would have been cool and she does have the experience to lead and had a front row seat alongside Bill for 8 years. I would have been okay with a President Hillary. But the Democrats are now led by the Move-On/Daily Kos crowd and their pick is Obama - the most radical left wing candidate their party has ever produced. This is an election that Dems should have won in a big way - yet they nominate Obama and make it a game. Thanks for the life line Dems - this will be close and shouldn't be.
Here are some facts:
Mr. Oxley proceeded to let Barney Frank (D., Mass.), then in the minority, roll all over him and protect the companies from stronger regulatory oversight. Mr. Oxley, who has since retired, was the featured guest at no fewer than 19 Fannie-sponsored fund-raisers.
Or consider the experience of Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, one of the GOP's bright young lights who decided in the 1990s that Fan and Fred needed more supervision. As he held town hall meetings in his district, he soon noticed a man in a well-tailored suit hanging out amid the John Deere caps and street clothes. Mr. Ryan was being stalked by a Fannie lobbyist monitoring his every word.
On another occasion, he was invited to a meeting with the Democratic mayor of Racine, which is in his district, though he wasn't sure why. When he arrived, Mr. Ryan discovered that both he and the mayor had been invited separately -- not by each other, but by a Fannie lobbyist who proceeded to tell them about the great things Fannie did for home ownership in Racine.
When none of that deterred Mr. Ryan, Fannie played rougher. It called every mortgage holder in his district, claiming (falsely) that Mr. Ryan wanted to raise the cost of their mortgage and asking if Fannie could tell the congressman to stop on their behalf. He received some 6,000 telegrams. When Mr. Ryan finally left Financial Services for a seat on Ways and Means, which doesn't oversee Fannie, he received a personal note from Mr. Raines congratulating him. "He meant good riddance," says Mr. Ryan.
In 2003 Mr. Raines pocketed more than $20 million. Fannie's left-wing defenders are underwriters of crony capitalism, not affordable housing.
The Clinton administration's White House Budget Director Franklin Raines ran Fannie and collected $50 million. Jamie Gorelick — Clinton Justice Department official — worked for Fannie and took home $26 million. Big Democrat Jim Johnson, recently on Obama's VP search committee, has hauled in millions from his Fannie Mae CEO job.
Obama has some of the Fannie peeps on his staff now and he questions McCain's???
Facts are facts which is why you won't admit to them.
Obama is in their pockets...he is not telling the entire story..surprise...and, I am sure, he is not breaking any US laws....yet. Rangle is only the beginning.
And Guess what Bill Gates didn't graduate but Bill Gates was an A student at Harvard and dropped out to run his company, you know Microsoft, so he can make money. But you know where he got the knowledge to do that? HARVARD. He went to Harvard learned at harvard, took classes in computers and business at Harvard, and when he had enough, he and his HARVARD friends left and started Microsoft because he learned what he needed to know. No at U of Idaho as a C student so maybe again that sheds some light on the veil of ignorance.
And let me teach you someone as someone intelligent enough not just to read the talking points from Rush, Fannie Mae employees, as if people making $40K a year sectaries janitors etc donated $200K to Obama because his campaign did not take corporate gifts look it up if you must. When they give those numbers they are referring to employees of the company not the corporation itself. And guess what Phil Graham,look him up, he called the US a nation of whiner, he said we were only going through a mental recession, the guy who wrote the deregulation legislation, the big corporate lobbyist, in fat he is the chief lobbyist for big oil, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac well that guy his is McCain's chief financial advisor. Obama does not have 1 paid lobbyist on his staff and thats a documented fact. You can lie on here all you want and the only person you re convincing is yourself and those who choose to be low information voters. I can name 28 big business lobbyists McCain has or had on staff in during this campaign, aside from Graham, there is Slade Gorton,James A. Courter, Tom Loeffler, Charlie Black, David Crane,Rick Davis, Robert Aiken,John Timmons,Timothy McKone,Carlos Bonilla,Aquiles Suarez,Grant Aldonas,Nancy Mitchell Pfotenhauer, James F. Rill, Anthony Villamil, Joseph Wright, Matt Salmon, Don Sundquist, William 'Van' Hilleary, Richard Zimmer,Mike P. Dennehy,Brian Ballard,Jerry KilgoreDavis Manafort, Wayne Berman, Christian Ferry, and Mike Dennehy to name a few. Name name one registered lobbyist Obama has on staff before you accuse him of being in the pocket of big business.
And you want to talk about checks from big business, Jim Johnson served as CEO of fannie mae from 1991 to 1998 you know when it was doing good.Carly Fiorina on the other hand, you know the lady who works for McCain as economics advisor, the one who said she would not trust him or Palin to run a major corporation yesterday, well she ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground sent the stock price tumbling 50%+ and cutting thousands of jobs before she was fired ( not like Johnson who left to take a better job on his own accord)and give over $20 million in a severance package.
And what does Rangle have to do with Obama? I know THEY ARE BOTH BLACK RIGHT?
Before you accuse others and make attacks do me a favor and change the channel from Fox and pick up a news paper that does not say Republican talking points on the top of it. I did and I am amazed.
Great post!
jasev01,
Precisely when are we going to see those Obama transcripts? Oh, I know.....we are simply supposed to believe it because they say it's so. I seem to recall that John Kerry had gone to Yale and was "so much" smarter than George Bush. His transcripts(reflecting a LOWER GPA) were only released after the election. HOW CONVENIENT!!!
1. he is inexperienced;
2. he hasn’t adequately addressed his close associations with William Ayers, a former member of the terrorist group “Weather Underground,” and convicted criminals Tony Rezko and Kwame Kilpatrick;
3. his 20 year active involvement with a church and preacher who used the pulpit for hate speech against the United States; and last but not least,
4. his extreme liberal voting record, including opposing a bill that would have protected the life of a baby born alive during an unsuccessful abortion attempt. Obama would have allowed the baby to simply die, unattended by any medical care.
White people have been voting for Jews for years, so it shows that race is not an issue in the slightest. In fact, with Jews race is rarely ever brough up as an issue, unless the candidate is religious and expresses their views. But with blacks, suddenly now race is a giant issue just because their skin is dark and they physically look and speak differently than whites. I've lived and worked with whites for all my life and have not seen this kind of thing these articles are threatening.
Why is race a factor now? And is it a factor only with whites, but also with Jews, Hispanics, Asians and all other races?
I think it's time the media got accountable for this. The whole "race" issue in this election is a joke. If we're going to debate race, let's put it all on the table.
And this is why the rainbow coalition gets close but not over the top. Gays, Blacks, Hispanics, ProChoice, Unions and Catholics often have competing and conflicting interests. So mumble a "nuance" and ask for contributions. Seems to work but they always wind up sounding hypocritical and lose outside the shaky base.
Signs at a recent rally - Support a women's right to choose! Save the Whales! Stop the War!
Huh?
Race may be a factor --- for Demos ---- Demos appear to think that OhBummer should be exempt from ciriticism ---- his critics must be racist! I've heard that he is only 1/8th black and 7/8ths Arabic bloodline, however ----- so how does that qualify him as "black"? And why should we walk on eggs around him if his socialist ideas stink, in any case? Socialized medicine has failed to deliver wherever it has been tried, it has only worsened quality and busted government budgets --- and calling it "single-payer" or "universal" or "pastrami" will do nothing to improve the concept, versus market-oriented systems.
A more likey hypothesis applicable today is that the current financial crises is,in part, driven by anticipation of 2 far-left leaning, double talking, liberal lawyers securing the White House and the attendent Judicial appointments for at least the next 4 years.
Four years ago, Obama, Biden and other democrats were demogoguing the banking system for NOT making more 'liberal loans' to the poor and 'disadvantaged minorities' in our nation. The banks caved to their pressure and wrote higher risk loans to poorly qualified borrowers. Many of those borrowers have defaulted on their loans in the last 2 years, triggering the collapse of our mortgage banks system, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.
Today, Obama, Biden, and other democrats are demogoguing those troubled financial institutions as 'market speculators' and 'greedy capitalists'. This is not 'Leadership'. It is avoidance of responsibility and culpability. Our Congress has responsibility for oversight and regulation of our banking system, including mortgage lending. Both Senators Obama and Biden were there, Biden for +30 years. They supported the relaxed lending pratices that led to the current default-driven crises. The markets are just reacting to the real possibility that they will get more 'help' from the likes of Barrack Hussein Mohammed Obama and Joseph Biden. Be very careful what you ask for America, you just might get of it!
Then read the following about Obama's desired new layer of government:
"There seems to be more and more talk about Mr. Obama finishing his new Domestic Deal agenda which he modeling after Roosevelt’s New Deal. His inner circle is trying to keep the lid so they can control when it gets released but parts are leaking out already.
"Work out agreement with Pelosi to make her Supreme Court justice so she can pursue her liberal agenda, which includes a gay rights amendment and several other federal laws modeled after the ones in place in California already for homosexual rights. First, she would get congress to support an overturn of the law-limiting president to two terms. He would then begin a massive overhaul change of the government like never seen before. He plan for this to take 12 – 15 years. He would install a new layer of neighborhood government that would run the neighborhood under the city level. This would allow for the government to influence more family and civic responsibilities around schooling, oversight of healthcare, parenting responsibilities, activities to reduce crime, reduce divorce and family break ups, reduce drug use, required participation in neighborhood meetings/activities, and monitor acceptance and roll out of the “Domestic Deal” agenda. It would provide our country its first experiment with socialism, which he sees as the CHANGE people have been seeking. Mr. Obama plans to staff this layer of government with campaign supporters initially and fund it with reductions in military that he has already discussed."
If anyone can source the above quotation, I'd really appreciate it.
The Black President: A Black President is one that takes from the rich and
gives to the poor and destroys a nation in the process.
A black-hearted person is mean and unloving.
A blacklist is a list of undesirable persons or entities (to be placed on
the list is to be "blacklisted").
Black comedy is a form of comedy dealing with morbid and serious topics.
A black mark against you is a bad thing.
A black mood is a bad one (cf Winston Churchill's clinical depression, which
he called "my black dog").[3]
black market is used to denote the trade of illegal goods, or alternatively
the illegal trade of otherwise legal items at considerably higher prices,
e.g. to evade rationing.
Black propaganda is the use of known falsehoods, partial truths, or
masquerades in propaganda to confuse an opponent.
Blackmail is the act of threatening to reveal information about a person
unless the threatened party fulfills certain demands. This information is
usually of an embarrassing or socially damaging nature. Ordinarily, such a
threat is illegal.
If you sink the black eight-ball in billiards before all others are out of
play, you lose.
The black sheep of the family is the ne'er-do-well.
To blackball someone is to block their entry into a club or some such
institution. In the traditional English gentlemen's club, current members
vote on the admission of a candidate by secretly placing a white or black
ball in a hat. If upon the completion of voting, there was even one black
ball amongst the white, the candidate would be denied membership, and he
would never know who had "blackballed" him.
Now we have Black Sunday: September 14 the day the stock market dropped
500 points.
We have Black Project: A black project is a secretive project, like Enigma
Decryption, other classified military programs or operations, Narcotics, or
police sting operations.
In computer security, a blackhat is an attacker with evil intentions, while
a whitehat bears no such ill will.
In many Hollywood Westerns, bad cowboys wear black hats while the good ones
wear white.
Melodrama villains are dressed in black and heroines in white dresses.
A "black day" (or week or month) usually refers to a sad or tragic time. The
Romans marked fasti days with white stones and nefasti days with black.
E.g., the Wall Street Crash 1929, the stock market crash on October 29, 1929
which is the start of the Great Depression, is nicknamed Black Tuesday, and
was preceded by Black Thursday, a downturn on October 24 the previous week.
Black Monday, stock market crash on October 19, 1987.
Black Wednesday caused Britain to pull out of the European Exchange Rate
Mechanism.
Black Friday, various tragic events. (Exception: See Black Friday
(shopping).)
Black months include:
the Black September in Jordan, in which thousands were killed.
Black July killing of the Tamil population by the Sinhalese government in
Sri Lanka.
Black Spring 2001 (Printemps noir), in the Berber region of Kabylia
(Algeria), when the police shot and killed more than 100 people.
The Black Death, also known as the Black Plague, was a pandemic in Europe
which killed tens of millions of people.
The Black Hole of Calcutta was the overcrowding of an impromptu prison cell
in which many died.
We have Johnny Cash: His song "Man in Black" presents it as a show of
solidarity with the outcasts of society.
Time magazine's Michael Grunwald says race is the elephant in the room.
He says Barack Obama needs to tread lightly as he fights back against the
McCain-Palin campaign attacks.
Does your mind really just work on that small level?
What definition is being used by whom and for who?
Regardless, $10 says that if Obama loses in November, the US will see a number of riots erupt simultaneously across the country. Arson. Looting. Mayhem. Standard liberal behavior. With low-lifes like those, who needs rednecks?
The first black president possibility is huge among blacks. If you watched or saw photos from the night Sen. Obama became the official Democratic presidential nominee at the convention, you saw some teary eyed blacks, especially men. I understand how it was a huge historic emotional moment in the black community; even though as a black woman, I am a McCain supporter (my family thinks I am crazy).
Read this blog post from a Philadelphia, PA blogger:
http://mobyrebuttal.blogspot.com/2008/09/reemer...
Please note that Philly has always been strongly Democrat.
People can make al the excuses they want but I am glad someone finally admit it the problem here is racism. i read some of the comment below people are concerned with him being a natural us citizen, do you know what that means? If 1 of your parents is a citizen of the US you are no matter where you are born and the fact is further he was born in America. McCain however was not born in America he was born in Panama do you worry about that too? Of better He is friends with criminals well guess what Raffaello Follieri a convicted felon stole $50 million from the Catholic church well McCain was on his boat the shaking his hand the day after he was convicted just this year google it. No experience ah yes and so mcCain picks that woman who took 6 years a n 5 school to get a C average at a less than famous school and who has been out of North America 1 time in life. She is supposed to be the back up to the 72 year old cancer patient who statistically will die in his first term. Thats it its experiece. Oh no I get it Republicans have done an excellent job the last 8 years spending the $100+ Billion surplus and turning it into a $257 Billion deficit, destroying 3 white shoe firms, firms that have survived through 2 world wars and the great depression, of and fannie mae and Freddie mac well we see what happened there, and oh year enron world Com, decreasing salaries, inflation, 6.2% unemployment but McCain says everything is doing fine and we should believe him because he invented the blackberry. Because if you believe that you believe that palin said no thanks to the bridge to nowhere even though she endorsed it and KEPT the $275million of YOUR tax dollars regardless of whether the bridge was built, maybe she used a bit of it to pay for the $40k tanning bed she installed for her depression. Or maybe McCain can fix the lobbyist problem and the deregulation problem even though his chief advisor is the one who WROTE THE LEGISLATION TO DEREGULATE INDUSTRIES AND WAS THE CHIEF LOBBYIST FOR FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC AS WELl AS THE OIL AND FINANCIAL INDUSTRY. Yes he will fix it because he is the one who broke it and know how to except he says he know nothing about the economy. Oh say he will decrease earmarks because his VP has asked for more and received more earmark money per capital than any other state and since her state's government is not funded by taxes like the rest of us its funded by oil money and federal funding. The real reason not to vote for Obama i because he is an elitist, I get it growing up on welfare with a single mother then taking loans to get through college makes you an elitist. Then taking that education and using it to help the poor and Union workers elitist. McCain's $600 shoes and his wife's $335,000 outfit for the Republican convention those are for average americans. And that $100,000 she spent on her AmEx card thats normal. We all have $100 million bank accounts. right. The fact that Obama wants to increase the tax rate a few percent for those who make over $250K so that everyone who makes $250k or less can get a tax decrease and we can fund schools and build building and road in our country and not iraq he is wrong for that. The fact that Warren buffet Alan Greenspan and even Hank Paulson all agreed with his plan that means nothing. The fact that Bush is currently using Obama's military plan that all means nothing, McCain's plain to tax middle class americans so that he can give tax breaks to oil companies and corporation who have record profits hopefully it will trickle down to the middle class. Mccain's plan for getting your own healthcare is much better than Obama's which would give you a tax credit to pay for healthcare. Yes McCain sounds like a 100% better candidate than Obama and it has nothing to do with race at all. Who cares Obama graduated with honors from Columbia and Harvard law, that Biden too has a law degree, they want affirmative action. McCain graduation 5th from the bottom of his class and Palin's C average from U of idaho in journalism.Common sense says I don't vote for the guy who has lied about everything that he has campaigned on. McCain says I'm a maverick I'm going to fix wall street its those dirty politician who deregulated the industry that destroyed it. What he failed to mention was just earlier this year he said he is a "deregulator" and believes in complete deregulation. And that whole this about what I meant the the economy is sound clean up, well he said that 22 other times this year "my friend" so I think it clear what he meant. McCain shows that he is inept and incompetent everyday. Everyday he says something outrageous, like his campaigned saying he invented the blackberry, which is Canadian by the way, then when he is called on it he says oh well i am a war hero a POW. Well what he doesn't tell the public is he gave up his squadron the size of his force and all kinds of other classified information putting other soldiers at risk so he could be better medical treatment. Oh an I know its becuase they beat him and tortured him right, well he said in his own book that all they did was " slap him around a bit...and when they found out I [McCain] was the son of an admire they gave me better treatment." In fact his jailor endorsed in in the BBC, his jailor said McCain and he were friends and that McCain taught him english.. His Jailor said McCain was never tortured but I wouldn't believe him. Conveniently however the DOD records at the time confirm McCain was taken to a special hospital and given VIP treatment. And conveniently McCain's CO's in the camp say too that McCain was never tortured. He broke his bones crashing his 5th plane and they just weren't set properly. But don't ask about any of that because he is a war hero. And Palin, well her education and qualification don't ask her because she is a woman and thats sexist. Speaking about scandalous Keating 5 don't ask McCain about that either because he has experience in Washington.
Phil Graham, look him up, he called the US a nation of whiner, he said we were only going through a mental recession, the guy who wrote the deregulation legislation, the big corporate lobbyist, well that guy his is McCain's chief financial advisor. That's the guy I want to fix stuff; thats the experience I am looking for.
I don't fear palin, except that she will destroy our economy and cause world war 3/armageddon over her beliefs and ignorance. Thats why I fear her; intellectually I don't fear her, I am 10000% more qualified and more intelligent than she will ever be. No just because I graduated from a Ivy league undergrad and law schools with honors its because I know what the bush doctrine is and I have a degree in economics/business, political science and in law; most importantly I have a doctorate and I am 25 and she does not and she is 44. names of school mean nothing, what the school teaches you is what means something and Columbia teaches you slightly more than U of Idaho thats why its so hard to get in. Further, having a doctorate in law makes you slightly more qualified than having nothing. Class standing is important because it shows you how much the person learned. McCain finished at 796/800 therefore there are 795 more qualified people out there. A dog is dedicated to the job, heck they are man's best friend they can't be more dedicated to the take of getting something done but I would not trust the dog to run for president because of that dedication. Not to be crass but I had the opportunity to work with the mentally handicapped and they are the most dedicated people i have met, but still they can't be president.
just before the great depression Hoover said "the fundamentals of the economy are sound.' Sound familiar? Maybe this, the collapse of financial institutions, increase in debt, malfeasance by bankers, massive layoffs, under regulation, sharp decrease in the stock market, lack of government deficit spending, business have too much power, Inequality of wealth and income, any of those things sound familiar? Well they caused the great depression How did we get over it?The New Deal, increasing government spending ,Reforming the financial system, especially the banks and Wall Street, Setting minimum prices and wages and competitive conditions in all industries, and Instituting regulations. Sound familiar yet? Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics charged that he was turning America into a socialist state, However, spending on the New Deal was far less than the amount spent on the war. Familiar yet? Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan a lifelong Republican and longtime friend of McCain, said on Bloomberg the U.S. can't afford $3.3 trillion of tax cuts proposed by Republican presidential nominee John McCain. He also said this crisis is a `Once in Century' Event but McCain says not big deal. You are right I am a liberal socialist, jsut like what they said about FDR and the New Deal, me an Greenspan and buffet, and Paulson all of us liberal socialists.
And Guess what Bill Gates didn't graduate but Bill Gates was an A student at Harvard and dropped out to run his company, you know Microsoft, so he can make money. But you know where he got the knowledge to do that? HARVARD. He went to Harvard learned at harvard, took classes in computers and business at Harvard, and when he had enough, he and his HARVARD friends left and started Microsoft because he learned what he needed to know. No at U of Idaho as a C student so maybe again that sheds some light on the veil of ignorance.
And let me teach you someone as someone intelligent enough not just to read the talking points from Rush, Fannie Mae employees, as if people making $40K a year sectaries janitors etc donated $200K to Obama because his campaign did not take corporate gifts look it up if you must. When they give those numbers they are referring to employees of the company not the corporation itself. And guess what Phil Graham,look him up, he called the US a nation of whiner, he said we were only going through a mental recession, the guy who wrote the deregulation legislation, the big corporate lobbyist, in fat he is the chief lobbyist for big oil, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac well that guy his is McCain's chief financial advisor. Obama does not have 1 paid lobbyist on his staff and thats a documented fact. You can lie on here all you want and the only person you re convincing is yourself and those who choose to be low information voters. I can name 28 big business lobbyists McCain has or had on staff in during this campaign, aside from Graham, there is Slade Gorton,James A. Courter, Tom Loeffler, Charlie Black, David Crane,Rick Davis, Robert Aiken,John Timmons,Timothy McKone,Carlos Bonilla,Aquiles Suarez,Grant Aldonas,Nancy Mitchell Pfotenhauer, James F. Rill, Anthony Villamil, Joseph Wright, Matt Salmon, Don Sundquist, William 'Van' Hilleary, Richard Zimmer,Mike P. Dennehy,Brian Ballard,Jerry KilgoreDavis Manafort, Wayne Berman, Christian Ferry, and Mike Dennehy to name a few. Name name one registered lobbyist Obama has on staff before you accuse him of being in the pocket of big business.
And you want to talk about checks from big business, Jim Johnson served as CEO of fannie mae from 1991 to 1998 you know when it was doing good.Carly Fiorina on the other hand, you know the lady who works for McCain as economics advisor, the one who said she would not trust him or Palin to run a major corporation yesterday, well she ran Hewlett-Packard into the ground sent the stock price tumbling 50%+ and cutting thousands of jobs before she was fired ( not like Johnson who left to take a better job on his own accord)and give over $20 million in a severance package.
IF YOU DARE READ IT AND SHOW ME WHERE I SAID SOMETHING NOT TRUE PLEASE
What if Michelle Obama were a wife who not only became addicted to pain killers, but acquired them illegally through her charitable organization? What if Cindy McCain graduated from Harvard? What if Obama were a member of the "Keating 5"? What if McCain was a charismatic, eloquent speaker?
If these questions reflected reality, do you really believe the election numbers would be as close as they are?
This is what racism does. It covers up, rationalizes and minimizes positive qualities in one candidate and emphasizes negative qualities in another when there is a color difference.
Thank you, Corbinet, for stating what's really important: the issues, not someone's race.
Obama plans to return to the failed policies of high taxation coupled with an expansion of government spending.
Selibus is a muirderer of partial and botched abortions.
Baryy Hussein Obama is nothing but a left wing 'N'
He is the candidate because many white people voted for them. Just stop using race as an excuse and grow up.
What if I won't vote for him because of: Rev. Wright; the goofy Catholic Priest; William Ayers; Obama's incredibly leftist political beliefs?
Gov. Sebelius doesn't get out much does she :)
If he wanted to imprison and slaughter all jews, would that qualify under: "at least he HAS ideas"?
Lady, the "specifics" of the ideas are actually important!!!
Again you have shown yourself to be just against the man for whatever reason You said"If Obama ever actually provides a specific policy it will most likely offend me because it will involve higher taxes." First that statement suggests that you are not willing to hear what he has to say if will ofend you because he said it. Second it shows you have done nothing but read the republican talking points. If you make OVER $250K then your taxes may go up sightly. If You make $250K or less you will recieve a tax cut under Obama' plan that has been endorsed by Allan Greenspan, life long republican and economic guru; Warren buffet, life long republican and economic guru; and Hank Palson, my former boss, former CEo of Goldman Sachs and current Secretary of the treasury. Greenspan actually said (check the bloomberg) MCCAIN"S PLAN WONT WORK. Obama wants to return the tax levels to the place they were before Bush cut them, you know when the economy was doing good, when we had surplus when gas was $1.50, when people had jobs and wages were increasing, when people's houses were not being foreclosed on. Thats the point he wants to put tax levels back at. Those were terrible times compared to now I know, we would not want to go back there.
PLEASE GO TO FREE DOWNLOADS AT DRDINO.COM THE KING IS COMING...ARE YOU READY ?
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I was getting ready to vote for him until you pointed that out.
I'm voting for the 100% white guy.
Don't we have the ultimate in qualifications in the white house now? In 2004, he had been president for 4 years and governor for 4 years, and had numerous business experiences.
Where did that get us????
mn
So I guess the Governor is correct, race is a factor in this election.
People are allowed to support a candidate for whatever reason, regardless of how others feel. Just as some may NOT vote for Obama because of his race, many will vote for him simply because of his race. Just as many vote for or against women, latinos, conservatives, liberals, Dems, Reps, abortion supporters, etc. simply because they represent a specific group. That may not be the best reason to support someone, but that is the choice of each voter and most voters are guilty of this in one way or another.
Governor Sebelius is guilty of voting fo Obama simply because he is a Dem...so what's the difference? Why should she condemn others for their choice when her choice is obviously determined by a predjudice too and not by objective analysis. Is she willing to stand up and say she is a partisan person who votes her allegiance instead of objectively analyzing each candidate?
Me thinks the Governor is a HYPOCRITE!
97% of European-Americans vote for McCain. Now THAT's racist.
.
.
Get It?
If by racist, you mean that I do not like someone who did the following:
1) Attended the United Church of Christ for twenty years
2) Was married by one Rev. Jeremiah Wright in said church
3) Had both daughters baptized by said Rev.
4) Titled one of his two memoirs (yes, TWO!) "The Audacity of Hope" after a sermon by said Rev.
5) Gave over $25K in donations to said Rev.'s UCC
6) Claimed that he was unaware of Rev. Wright's "USKKKofA," "Chickens have come home to roost," or "God damn America!" comments and other breathtakingly hateful sermons sold on PROFESSIONALLY TAPED DVD FOR CHURCH FUNDRAISING PURPOSES.
7) Has a wife who said "for the first time in my adult life, I am proud to be an American."
8) Goes to San Francisco to rub elbows with wealthy donors to say "those people cling to their guns, religion, and xenophobia" when he is unaware that someone is in the room with a recorder
9) Says he would talk to Ahmadeenijad, Kim Jong Il, and Bashar Assad, treating them as fully legitimate
10) Refuses to have an INVITED representative appear on WGN Chicago's "Milt Rosenberg Extension 720" radio show, instead electing to send off a blast e-mail to all his local supporters to threaten said radio station with inane phone calls and even more inane e-mails.
11) ...and most of all...RESORTS TO HAVING HIS SYCOPHANTS TOSS OUT THE RACE CARD WHEN THINGS DO NOT GO HIS WAY!
So, yes, if by those examples you describe me as a racist, then, yes, I AM a racist.
You asked for the source for my earlier post. So. here part of Biden's bio from Wikipedia.
Biden attended the University of Delaware in Newark,[10] where by his own later description he was a lazy student.[11] He graduated with a double major in history and political science in 1965,[2] ranked 506th of 688 in his class.[12] He went on to receive his J.D. from Syracuse University College of Law in 1968,[10] where by his own description he again underperformed and ranked 76th of 85 students.[
As for Obama, I am sure that he did graduate with honors, but he still won't release his transcripts. Also, he won't release his thesis from Columbia
i'm an american of mexican and german decent. my girlfriend, whom i love, is black. i have 4 half-black nephews. i don't support obama because he is a socialist that holds the mechanisms that have made america great in contempt. he hates the free market. he hates industry. he hates individualism. but (and you have this in common with him) he loves a big hulking monstrosity of a government, to regulate the profitability out of industry and regulate the freedom out of the individual.
but i'm a racist, huh? i'm a racist because i don't support a socialist hack of a politician? you're fired. maybe california or massachusetts has a job for you.
http://www.aworkrelatedwebsite.com/Bestic/
There's no way a socialist like ObaMarx would be where he is if not for white guilt.
See the post at http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/16/sebelius-.... It seems that the Associated Press and/or Miami Herald has "sanitized" Ms. Sebelius' loony comments to make them more acceptable. Big Media...always a reliable ally for Obama and left wing Democrats...always ready to betray their responsibility to the American public.
Race has nothing to do with it. B. Hussein Obama's policies are socialist, he has NO experience (except the community organizer thing...giggity giggity), The guy can't even vote yes or no on Senate bills. Instead he votes present 130 times? You Democrats really picked a loser this time OMG!
So racism is as valid a reason as any. African Americans justifiably are proud of Obama, and will vote almost unanimously for him. That's okay. And if white men vote mostly for McCain, we should also allow this group to take pride in their candidate.
I don't think any white male that has been touched by affirmative action, is going to be shy about taking it out on Obama in the ballot box. Don't underestimate how much this issue completely pis*** off the folks that will decide this election. Because deep down racism is pretty offensive, and filling a slot solely on colour is as racist as it gets.
So if Obama doesn't win because of racism? Big deal. That is democracy, warts and all. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
Obama is dividing this nation - Just for Votes - How Pathetic
Obama is too inexperienced and has no firm sense of who he is. He is not a bad person, but should never have put himself and his family in this position.
The Governor of Kansas is another story. She is the daughter of a political hack, Celeste of Ohio, and she is just doing what comes naturally. I doubt that she has ever run a business, met a payroll, or had it tough like most of us.
Race baiting does not help our country, even if it excites minorities to vote blindly for somebody of their "race." The whole notion of race is discredited. Wait until these hateful tactics excite the "majority" on November 4.
No good can come of this nonsense. We are taught to love our fellow man, so let's do so.
Certainly race is not the only factor, but in a close race, it may be the determining factor.
I think that the promise of America is the opportunity to become successful. The role of the government is not to ensure that you are successful and taken care of. That is your job. I have no desire for the country to turn into a leftist plantation where the small business owner has all of his earnings taxed away to support the people who sit around and do nothing. Where the person who has worked hard for many years in order to move up the corporate ladder is villified as one of "the rich." Where we all pay nearly all of our earnings to the government and they "take care of" us with government programs such as socialized health care.
Your friends COULD be uncomfortable with him because they are uncomfortable that he is so new, he has very little experience (and pretty much zero executive experience...libs can say what they want about Palin-truth is she has 2 years more executive experience than the democratic prez nominee...) he has hardly had a stance on anything in IL state senate (except for infanticide) and the US senate and has not crossed party lines or lead on any piece of legislation, he has had 20+ year relations with a pastor who obviously hates white people and America (even though the pastor chooses to live in a white suburban neighborhood and still sticks by his sermons) AND a 20+ year history with a domestic terrorist, and his wife is a marxist. I mean, yeah, your friends could be racist too...
But the fact that you and other libs are willing to look past all of that and paint people like US as racist, proves that you are the only ones that care about his race and are voting for a man because of your white guilt. I mean, seriously, give me one accomplishment he has had? Reading a teleprompter and just being in the senate does not qualify anyone. And for that matter, neither does being black.
I am (and a lot of other fellow Kansans) are very sick of our governor. She restricted the construction of a coal plant that would have brought jobs to our state, she hosts one of the most infamous abortionists in the country to her governor's mansion for parties, and she politicized the Greensburg tornado when residents there didn't/don't want the government there to help in the first place (don't believe me? drive through and look: no one is moving back). I know because I live several miles from Greensburg.
Obama is dividing this nation
Google is your friend.
Demoncrats will do anything they have to do to win back power, even if it means losing a war and tanking the economy. The democraParty has been overtaken by Modern Liberalism and is hell bent on changing the country into something that it was never intended to be - following the model of European Socialists rather than the model given to us by our founding fathers.
Wake Up!!!
The original post claimed Obama was dividing this nation, not Democrats. I simply stated from my observations that this is not true and pointed out specific items which support my response. You can pass the buck onto the entire Democratic party if you wish - its simply not the point.
Republican policy does favor the rich over the middle class. McCain's tax and health care plans provide no relief for the middle class. He can continue to lie, stating Obama will raise taxes but its simply NOT true. McCain's tax plan provides relief for McCain whereas Obama's tax plan provides relief for me and the majority of Americans. How can policy that favors 1% of Americans be acceptable?
Since Bush took office the median household income has declined steadily, the economy has barely grown, less then 400,000 new jobs were created, more Americans lack health insurance, looming on a depression, economic crisis, higher credit card interest rates, foreclosures and wars that are costing trillions. I would like for you to explain to me how this all happened in the two years that the Democrats have had control of the House? The Republican backed Bush administration has failed the American people. You know it and should own up to it.
I live in Kansas and work with predominantly blue collar workers. I hear people bitch constantly about speaking to call centers in India or Mexico but still support an administration that gives corporation incentives to move jobs overseas. They all make under 250K a year and support a candidate that will NOT provide them tax relief. They bitch about the cost of health care and worry about their pensions or 401k but support a candidate that wants to privatized social security.
McCain is a second rate pathological liar and anyone who votes for him deserves what they get but I do not.
The Economy - was weak when Bush took over from Clinton - weakened a bit more during the first two years of his administration and then expoded (positively) for over 4 years. Economic indicators showed positive growth in the economy on every front. The stock market rose to record levels, the housing market was strong and values remained high, interest rates were low and inflation was nearly nonexistent. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were being created, etc. Certainly there were negatives and the unscrupulous lending policies of banks and other financial institution is indefensible even though the fault for their practices lies squarely upon their own shoulders rather than on those of politicians. If the Bush administration has culpability in this present crisis then so does the "do nothing" congress.
The wars - I'll never forget 911 and the devastatioin that caused to our nation. The country, at that time, realized that we had to take the fight to the terrorists. The rest of the world (Germany, France, and Russia) cowered behind their many lame excuses and would not help in the war effort. But, thanks to our president and his tremendous resolve, he took the battle to the terrorists and has sent them to flight. The biggest mistakes Bush made in the whole thing: 1) underestimating the irrational fanaticism of the radical Islamists - he did not realize how truly insane they are and 2) accepting Clinton era intelligence as to the existance of WMD's in Iraq, and 3) trusting his fellow Americans on the other side of the political aisle who let him get out on that proverbial limb and then have been trying to cut it off in the usual democratic, power-grabbing, manner. Along with that, he has had to battle the traitors that have infiltrated
the democratic party who have undermined (yes, they voted to fund the war, hypocritically, I might add) virtually every aspect of this dual-front war (Afghanistan and Iraq). But, George Bush did not give us this war - the terrorists who are bent on destroying western culture gave us this war. You are an idiot if think that George Bush or any other American, be it Democrat or Republican, finds any benefit in starting and progating wars for their own financial or political advantage.
The Republican policy does not favor the rich. You seem so gullible, simply spouting the party line when you dems say things like that. The people who pay the taxes are the ones who deserve the tax cuts. When you give tax cuts to businesses and other job providers (the rich as you call them), you make it more likely that there are going to be greater profits for businesses and greater numbers of jobs created and great incentive to start new businesses. You may not agree with the policy but the motive is not to "favor the rich." The motive is to help the economy and there by help everyone (or at least most everyone). The over simplification of simply giving tax breaks to the "middleclass" while sticking it to the mean, greedy rich people sounds good to some, but it is really not the way to help the economy. It is nothing but class envy. But even with that, lots of people have benefitted under this present administration who are not
rich. You can always find, in some segment of the economy during any administration, those who are not doing well. Economics is like that. What benefits one man hurts someone else. The price of gas goes up; I have to pay more for gas but some guy in Texas gets a job. So many Democrats have this simplistic view of life that misses the big picture.
The democratic party - the party of welfare, government entitlements, abortion, moral relativism, socialism, appeasement, hollywood elitism, race baiting, class warefare and a party that is becoming more and more Marxist as the months pass. Obama's health care policy is pure, unadulterated socialism. But, it is not Obama's health Care Poicy - it is the health care policy that Hillary and the democrats have tired to get through for years. I hope the American people reject it.
Have things gone well, recently for the country and for the Bush Administration - obviously not but this election is not about incidental issues - it never is. I don't vote issues - I vote philosophy -
I am not a socialist - I am a capitalist - I believe in a free market economy and less government and more personal responsibility. I don't want the government doing things for me - I want them to do their jobs according to the constitution and leave me to honor God, raise my family, and make my living on a free and level playing field in a social setting that acknowledges God, right and wrong, and general decency. Democrats have been undermining all of those values for decades. Can I defend the Republicans in everything - certainly not - but right now, the Republican party is more conservative than the Democrats - therefore I vote Republican - Personally, I think you would be better served not to vote for "parties" or for "men" but for values. I think that you would discover that conservative values lead to greater decency and greater personal success. It won't be the government that gives that to you, it will be you (and if you have a
relationship with the Lord, he will help you out a lot too.)
PLEASE GO TO FREE DOWNLOADS AT DRDINO.COM THE KING IS COMING...ARE YOU READY ?
<link media="all" type="text/css" href="/webmail/static/deg/css/wysiwyg-4230203003.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head><body>
Dont bother me at home, asshole
Sep 18, 2008 04:39:10 AM, wrote:
His background makes one shudder in its "uniqueness."
His "friends" and those he surrounded himself with are impossible to hide.
The day will come (and none too soon) when the rank and file Democrats find out what was done to them, and what was done to Hillary, and all the other candidates, and they will scream for Howard Dean's hide! They will all know that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid sat by and said nothing.
Exactly which parent was African American?
I'm afraid the folks in Kansas elected a dummy ....and a race baiter.
and mike steel for sure... a good american man
By the numbers, we know that white Republicans voted for Steele. Isn't that proof enough that white Republicans will vote for a black Republican? What other proof would you like to see to "PROVE" the hypothetical! Oh, that's right, he really was elected.
I would ask you to actually READ the history of the Republican Party and all that we have done to STOP DEMOCRATS FROM PREVENTING BLACKS FROM VOTING; but that would burst your biased bubble. Can't have any truth around here.
I would also ask you to follow the truth of the black Republicans who have been elected to office AND THE FACT THAT WHITE REPUBLICANS CAMPAIGNED FOR THEM, FINANCED THEIR CAMPAIGNS, AND VOTED FOR THEM!!!
Your own hatred and bias is such that you refuse truth and fill your mind with nonsense that is not true! Do you not see that as being UNFAIR TO YOUR OWN MIND!!!! Or do you owe yourself no truth if it makes a DEMOCRAT look bad?
Are you so "committed" to the Democrat party that you are willing to tolerate lies on its behalf?
DO YOU EVEN REALIZE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING? You are saying that you would rather believe LIES about Republicans than TRUTHS about Democrats. Do you not see the illogic to that? IS IT WORTH BELIEVING THAT REPUBLICANS ARE BAD JUST TO MAKE YOU HAPPY, AND THEN DENY THE TRUTH OF THE GOODNESS THAT THEY ARE HELPING TO CAUSE FOR BLACK CANDIDATES? That doesn't even make any sense!
Can you actually listen to Biden say that Obama is "clean" and really, in your heart, believe that Biden is not a lying hypocrite who looks down on blacks? Then, when you NEVER hear a Republican say anything of the kind, actually believe that he / she is MORE racist than Biden? Does that really make sense to you??
You really need to evaluate your priorities and what each party demands. A friend of mine "switched" parties about 12 years ago and is still amazed! He says he is now "free to think any thought." When he was a Democrat, he had to "push" certain thoughts out of his mind and refuse to answer others. He says that if he had known, he would have "switched" years earlier, but he "believed" what the Democrats said about Republicans. What made him switch? Well, he got transferred to a new group and his colleagues were easy going, happy, and laughing all the time, PLUS they were more willing to help him learn his new job and get along well, and he often wondered what the "deal" was and about six months in, he found out they were ALL Republicans. He said he had no idea that Republicans were "laid back and happy." I was pleased to "welcome him home."
The cries of racism are acts of despiration so that when he blows this election, his followers" can have an excuse. They will try to say that Republicans are racist. But, if he does lose, it will not be as a result of republicans not voting for him. We would not vote for him, regardless. It will be a result of Democrats not voting for him. If racism is the factor then it points to the reality that Democrats are the ones who were swayed against him as result of his race.
http://www.opencongress.org/person/sponsoredbil...
McCain
http://www.opencongress.org/people/sponsoredbil...
Your point?
For a Senator or Congressman to "sponsor" a bill does not mean that they authored the bills or even did anything to push the bill through their respective house. It simply means that they put their name on the bill to supposedly give it greater credibility when they vote on it. He may or may not have been given a few minutes on the floor to make a short supportive speech or something like that. It means very little other than to pad a politicians resume' for those who are ignorant enough to think that it really means something.
Obama, being a novice, needed to associate himself with as many bills as possible to give the appearance that he is really working hard and "fighting" for this cause or that cause. In reality, it's bogus. It is done, for the most part, to advance one's political carrier, which is what B. O. is all about. I know this is true of a lot of politicians but, in the brief time he has been in politics, how much of that time has been spent running for a higher public office and how much time has actually been spent doing the job he has been elected to do. I think that the time he has spent campaigning is grossly disproportionate to his work effort, even in relation to other politicians.
Senator McCain has been in the game for a long time and doesn't need any of that pseudo-credibility and knows that it is a bunch of window dressing. That is why he has "sponsored" so many fewer bills. He gains nothing by it. It is worthwhile to "sponsor" a bill to give it credibility for a vote, but it is not a resume's enhancer (or it shouldn't be considered as such).
Your point?
For a Senator or Congressman to "sponsor" a bill does not mean that they authored the bills or even did anything to push the bill through their respective house. It simply means that they put their name on the bill to supposedly give it greater credibility when they vote on it. He may or may not have been given a few minutes on the floor to make a short supportive speech or something like that. It means very little other than to pad a politicians resume' for those who are ignorant enough to think that it really means something.
Obama, being a novice, needed to associate himself with as many bills as possible to give the appearance that he is really working hard and "fighting" for this cause or that cause. In reality, it's bogus. It is done, for the most part, to advance one's political carrier, which is what B. O. is all about. I know this is true of a lot of politicians but, in the brief time he has been in politics, how much of that time has been spent running for a higher public office and how much time has actually been spent doing the job he has been elected to do. I think that the time he has spent campaigning is grossly disproportionate to his work effort, even in relation to other politicians.
Senator McCain has been in the game for a long time and doesn't need any of that pseudo-credibility and knows that it is a bunch of window dressing. That is why he has "sponsored" so many fewer bills. He gains nothing by it. It is worthwhile to "sponsor" a bill to give it credibility for a vote, but it is not a resume's enhancer (or it shouldn't be considered as such).
The hypocracy here is breathtaking.
He's a twit, with no relative experience, no defineable options or plans for the future, in short, he's a wannabe messiah.
If this fu**tard wins.... america gets what it deserves. I'd rather declare "dubya" emperor for life than have this monkey-eared buffoon as national dog-catcher.
God you people are stupid.
So, it sounds like you should be just as happy with a new "monkey-eared buffoon" as you are with the current "monkey-eared buffoon".
Also, Dubya has said more than a few times that God put him in the White House, so he's far more of a "wannabe messiah" than Obama who's NEVER made such claims.
BTW, Kenya is not an Arab country and B.O. Sr. was but NO STRETCH of the imagination of Arab descent unlike both Sununu's, Abazaid and other GOP giants who ARE Arabs.
And I also never stated that I was against Obama because he was nearly 50% arab, only that he was being dishonest in labeling himself as an African-American when he's less than 5% "black". To make matters worse he is claiming that McCain chose Palin only because she is a woman and would help him garner some of the female vote, which is hypocracy at it's finest considering he's claiming he'll be the first "black" president when really he won't be.
Also I never stated that Obama used the word "messiah" to describe himself, it is however quite obvious that he is behaving as if he IS a messiah, or worse yet the "vanguard of the proletariat" to put it in communist terms. His comments are little more than sweeping rhetoric that mystify the uneducated masses who are too stupid or blind to see the fact that no nation on earth could possibly finance his pie in the sky proposals.
Again, let me reiterate, God you people are stupid.
McCain wants to provide permanent tax relief for 1% wealthiest Americans, he wants to tax employer provided benefits as income, he wants to privatize social security, he votes against minimum wage increases, supports sending jobs overseas and has supported policy that suppresses American workers rights to choose unions. He DOESN'T even support equal pay for equal work for the women of America.
Furthermore, what bills did McCain sponsored or push through? What has been McCain's maverick moment in the 26 years he has been in the senate?
Please educate me.
I'd like to know how many POOR PEOPLE have hired you and provided you with a REAL job that you were able to support your family on and your way of life. Everyone I've ever worked for had more money than me and I wasn't jealous of them for having it. If I wanted more all I had to do was work hard for it and hoped that some day I made it as good as them, instead of wishing the Government would take it away from them and give it to me. I don’t believe in a progressive income tax, I believe we should have a fixed tax rate, 10 to 20% on everyone and all companies but I’m afraid most liberals could not handle that because it’s just not FAIR for them to have so much and not pay more.
If you have more belongings than a homeless person has then you are a hypocrite. If you have more then sell all of your possessions and join them. I'm sure they could provide you with a job, don't you?
You might as well get over it-if everyone in Our Country has their money STOLEN from them by the Government just so everyone will have an equal share of the pie will there be anyone left for the Government to take the money from, I’m afraid not, what will YOU do then?
Our Country was founded on freedom and we were not supposed to have a Nanny Government, you know, cradle to the grave mentality so many people have. How many Socialist Countries have to fail before you realize it’s not the way to go?
I love that you people generalize Democrats as socialists or envious of the rich. It's absurd, your absurd and your party is absurd.
McCain attempted to rein in the corrupt Fanny Mae/Freddie Mack several years ago but who was the biggest obstructionist, you guessed it, the democrats (Barney Franks, Chuck Schumer, Chris Dodd, etc…), now that's not to say there were no Republicans (or RINO'S as I like to call them) as being part of the problem, but who was the NUMBER ONE benefactor of monies from those Companies, you guessed it, Chris Dodd, did I mention he's a democrat. Now who was the NUMBER TWO benefactor of monies from those Companies, you guessed it, barack obama, and did I mention he’s a democrat too. Do I need to go on & on & on? By the way, that #1 & #2 rating is since 1989 I believe. Chris Dodd has been there for years so it's no huge surprise he's way up there but obama has only been in office for less than 4 years, how many long time Congressmen and Senators did he pass to get that honor, I don't know but maybe you do? Do we see a pattern here, I believe we do.
#1. I love it when you people cannot stand to be called what you are, I am a Conservative and proud of it, why don't you people just come out and tell America what you truly stand for and that's "Liberal" and tell them "honestly" what that means, which includes being a Socialist/Marxist or the extreme being a Communist. If you’re ashamed of being a Liberal then maybe you should rethink your politics.
#2. When you people start losing the argument you start calling the other person names and make lame statements like us being, "absurd."
#3. If the Framers of our Constitution were to come to life today do you think as a whole they'd believe we're following the Document they left us, my opinion is, "no they wouldn't, they’d fall right back into the grave with disbelief."
#4. Get the Government out of our Lives, return the power back to the states as it should be, and then we could move to the State of our choice. If you wanted to live in one that is ran by Liberals you should be grateful for the opportunity to do so, while I’d choose to live in one that’s Conservative, which would make me really happy.
Sticks and stones can break my bones but…never mind. Honest discussions only please.
This is laughable. I was called an asshole after my initial post not to mention a lot of other names. Bring it on though, I've taken on tougher.
If the Framers would be rolling over in their graves what do you think Jesus would be doing?
This is the wonder of Palin, by the way...... she didn't go to college to be a politician. That immediately makes her more qualified than the others. I could go on....
I wont take the bait on Palin though that woman makes my blood boil.
Not one person other then myself has cited source for fact.
Listen to a news cast, read a paper, get over yourself, learn the facts, not your egocentric version of them.
YOU learn YOUR facts and lay off the koolaid
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in...
Obama's father was/is a Muslim. I don't always agree with my father, but fundamentally we are the same because I WAS RAISED THAT WAY. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
Does this mean all Muslim are bad and inherently terrorists?
If so what is the point of liberating Muslim countries - should we just blow them off the face of the planet. Please explain.
"Obama is the product of a brief early-60s college romance and short-lived marriage between a black African exchange student and a white liberal Kansan who met at the University of Hawaii. His critical boyhood years--from two to ten--were spent neither in white nor black America but in the teeming streets and jungle outskirts of Djakarta. Obama's boyhood experiences in Indonesia--where his mother took him when she married another foreign exchange student--propelled him toward a worldview well beyond his mother's liberalism." ---http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/archive/barackobama/
Project Vote is a front for Acorn:
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-claims...
Are the American people ready for an elected president who was educated in a Madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?
This is the question Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s camp is asking about Sen. Barack Obama.
An investigation of Mr. Obama by political opponents within the Democratic Party has discovered that Mr. Obama was raised as a Muslim by his stepfather in Indonesia. Sources close to the background check, which has not yet been released, said Mr. Obama, 45, spent at least four years in a so-called Madrassa, or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia.
"He was a Muslim, but he concealed it," the source said. "His opponents within the Democrats hope this will become a major issue in the campaign."
If Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius has proof of racism as a whole she should talk about that but that wouldn’t fit her agenda because there is only one group of folks in our Country who are voting 90+ % for one candidate, any guesses which candidate that it and what race is voting for him.
I don’t see a persons color; I look at what a person does and what they do, are they a good person/citizen, are they a criminal, or are they a sleazy politician trying to keep us apart for their on agenda, only you & I can decide that?
There will always be some type of racism is this Country but that racism is on ALL sides and ms. sebelius knows it, but as a whole when I walk down the street and meet someone from a different race we usually say things like, “hello, how are you doing”; we don’t avoid each other like the plague.
It’s an issue perpetuated by one Party (democrat if you didn’t know) and they do it because if there is Race Harmony throughout our Great Country they’ll be the one on the losing side, and we can’t have that, now can we?
Watch what they do and mean, not just what they say!!!!!!
http://www.calebgrace.com
He is VERY dangerous ..... Please research these candidates for your self ....
More videos about Obama right here :
http://www.youtube.com/user/StudentsofAmerica
http://www.youtube.com/user/VetsForFreedomVideo
Unreal ..... How Obama has made it this far is scary and his party is showing their true colors ....
Please research the TRUTH before you VOTE in November !!!!!
and thanks to chris for this post ......
>What do the top ten cities with the highest poverty rate "all" have in
> common? Answer: Democrat leadership.
>
>
> Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican
mayor since 1961;
>
> Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;
>
> Cincinnati, OH (3rd)... since 1984;
>
> Cleveland, OH, (4th)... since 1989;
>
> Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor;
>
> St. Louis, MO (6th).... since 1949;
>
> El Paso, TX (7th) Has never had a Republican Mayor;
>
> Milwaukee, WI (8th)... since 1908;
>
> Philadelphia, PA (9th)... since 1952;
>
> Newark, NJ (10th)... since 1907.
>
> It is the disadvantaged who habitually elect Democrats,
> yet are still disadvantaged ... hmmm...make you wonder?
Does anymore REALLY need to be said ????????
Don't believe what they say, educate yourself on what they've done and voted for, only then will you know them and what they stand for.
What does a democrat and a tax break have in common-------------------------------NOTHING--------------------honest discussions about tax breaks is not in their vocabulary.
So what is McCain proposing for tax cuts again?
But you are wrong again, I do know what policies you support by reading your post and then your reply about who you’re supporting, which is obama, am I wrong?
As far as the obscene name calling I’m sorry that happened to you, we can have a discussion without going down that road but even though you weren’t obscene you did call me “absurd”. To be honest with you I did call you a, “LIBERAL”, which in my world is not a good word but I didn’t curse you, at least with normal cuss words.
As far as your last line, Jesus said teach them to be fisher of men and they can teach someone else to fish, which means they will be self-sufficient and not being a burden on someone else or society. Do you really think he was telling them to catch fish and give it away? Interpret the entire Bible not just part of it.
As far as McCain's tax cuts he advocating the same as obama is now, remember obama said since the economy is sluggish he won't rescind the Bush Tax Cuts. Now if it's bad to tax now why is it good to tax even more when things are better. I believe we are paying enough taxes now, our problem is not that the government is taxing us to little it's they're spending too much. Can you write an unlimited amount of checks on your checking account without having the funds in the bank to cover the checks, I THINK NOT?
I've answered a few of your questions but so far you've passed on answering any of mine-hummm.
1. Has John McCain ever run a household (literally)? Has he EVER really sat down at table and paid bills? Has he ever had to negotiate with a bill collector or the telephone company? Has he ever seen a utility bill? From what I have seen and heard about John McCain, I have concluded that he has been sheltered all of his life by his parents (until Cindy took over). His schoolboy antics and irresponsibility towards his MILITARY studies was excused, and even LAUGHED about, because of his family’s military name and reputation (he brags about graduating 5th to the bottom of his class). John McCain was only married for a short time (less than 2 years?) before he went off to Vietnam. Then he was a POW for 51/2 years after that. When he came home he immediately started gadabouting around with other women and eventually hooked up with Cindy. She has been taking care of him and his ex-wife since then (John gives his yearly salary to charity every year, I heard him say). John McCain has lived off of his family’s money and reputation, then Cindy’s family’s money and reputation all of his life. If John McCain has never run his own life and built his own wealth and reputation, then how is he going to run the WHOLE COUNTRY and build our wealth and reputation?
2.What has John McCain done to show that he has the judgment to run our country? He (laughingly) admits that he exercised poor judgment when he was in school and did not do well. He jokes about how he did not study his flight manual well, and did not know his plane instruments, but “mavericked” his way out of dangerous situations. When he was shot down in Vietnam he admits that he exercised poor judgment when he gave the opponents false information just to get medical care. Now, I do understand that when in that much pain (two broken shoulders), you are liable to do anything to get out of it. But, John McCain was a SOLDIER! And soldiers are only supposed to give “name, rank and serial number” – true? It is understandable that he (like many other soldiers, I'm sure) could not handle such situations. If that is the case, then WHY ARE WE PRAISING John McCain for being a war HERO? He did not save anybody, or particularly help any of his fellow POWs in any notable way. Shot down just like the rest of our POWs, John McCain deserves no more accolades than they get. John McCain's choice to remain in POW camp, when offered a chance to go home was not a choice for the American people or for his fellow POWs. There was already an established agreement between the POWs at Hanoi before John McCain got there— the first person that was imprisoned was the first person to leave. John knew that if he used his family’s reputation to leave Hanoi first, he would have never been able to live that down. So why is John McCain floating this incidence as a measure of his character and a service to the American people? That was not a noble gesture. That was a selfish and political decision to help himself— not his fellow POWs or the country.
3. John McCain admits that he did not know his wife, Cindy, was addicted to drugs. If John McCain is so OUT OF TOUCH with the people he claims to love, lives with and sees on a regular basis, then how is he going to look out for people with whom he has no direct contact? John McCain has POOR JUDGMENT. (I later found out that John McCain always knew about poor Cindy. All he did was try to hide it so it would not interfere with his campaign. If John McCain was willing to put his political ambitions before the health of his own wife—what will he do to the American people?)
4. John McCain admits that he had poor judgment when he got involved with the Keating scandal. Even the judge who heard the case said that John’s judgment was bad. Why hasn’t John McCain demanded Keating to pay back the 2 BILLION dollars he still owes to the American people? Is it because Cindy’s family profited from the whole fiasco (her family was into a property deal with Keating during all of the Keating mess)? Is John McCain still friends with Keating?
5. John McCain and his party claims to want less government, yet they are eager to overturn Roe vs. Wade. What is his John McCain’s plan to take care of all of the unwanted babies we already have in this country and in the world? And, I am not just talking about the unwanted children in the orphanages, but the children that go hungry and uncared for every day in America. If John McCain is so gun-ho on overturning the Roe vs. Wade decision, then what provisions has he made to accommodate the EVEN MORE unwanted babies that will be born? If John McCain wants to control the rights of a woman’s body, why does he vote against issues that protect the health of a woman’s body? It is silly to legally force women to have unwanted babies, but refuse to help them get birth-control covered by medical insurance companies. Just that alone would cut down on unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. John McCain has no judgment.
6. Is John McCain a true Christian? Has he ever been baptized? I heard him say he was baptized as a baby, but when you truly accept Christ as your personal savior, the Bible says that you must publicly show your faith by being baptized. I believe that Evangelicals have been bamboozled by John McCain. I do not believe that Christians knows that John McCain has not been baptized as a Christian. I am much remised by Rick Warren, as he did not press John McCain about his faith (you know—give his testimony as to how he met Christ), instead let him get away with those tired old POW stories that happened almost 40 years ago. What about since then? What about now? What in his life is the measure of his true faith? What—killing innocent people and destroying a country in the name of terrorism when it was really about oil (he said that)? When did John McCain get “religion” —before or after he cheated on and left his first wife and daughter for Cindy? Or was it when he thought he were going to pay for your sins for dealing with Charles Keating? It certainly could not have been when he was in POW camp, as he somewhat claims (remember, in POW camp on Christmas “just two Christians, praying”). If that was the case, he could not have, in FAITH, done the things that he has done. OR, did John McCain get religion when it was politically beneficial to do so to win the presidency?
7. And I cannot begin to question his behavior when obtaining his first political job in Arizona. It’s just TOO MUCH!
8. And now to find out that Cindy McCain lied about meeting Mother Theresa? Oh, my God! This is TOO scary! What won't the McCain's lie about?
In my opinion, John McCain is not fit to be President. He has joked about his lifetime of reckless behavior, as though it does not matter. These behaviors have made him the man that he is today! It is evident in this campaign--how he is able to LIE, and not feel ashamed. These are some issues the American people NEED TO KNOW!!!
he's AFRICAN, baby! yeahhhhhh!!!! boy!!!!!!!
Liberals have been saying for years that conservatives "hate blacks" and "fear strong women." Bullsh1t! Minorities with conservative principles (Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Condoleeza Rice, Janice Rogers Brown, Colin Powell, J.C. Watts and MANY others) are welcome, although the "tolerant" liberal establishment castigates them as "Uncle Toms" and "not authentically black."
As for strong women, how about Sarah Palin, Condoleeza Rice (again), Jeane Kirkpatrick, Elizabeth Dole, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Elaine Chao, Margaret Spelling, and others. Of course, if they don't approve of unfettered abortion for any reason, the National Organization for (liberal) Women says they're not "really" in tune with women's issues; of course the media laps it up, even though NOW is tiny (MAYBE 150,000 members in a country of 300+ million) an is scarcely representative of mainstream opinion.
The Democrats can whine about racism and sexism (Hillary may have been criticized because of her policies, but didn't see one-tenth the actual sexist comments Palin has endured), but until they take a look in the mirror and see that they do NOT represent America, they're going to continue to get 9% approval ratings. Trying to get to a majority by wrangling a coterie of competing interest groups is like herding cats; you can keep it up for a while, but eventually they go their own way. Better to determine what's actually best for the COUNTRY (what a concept!) and govern that way.
If I remember correctly, wasn't Ms. Sebelius caught lying about the National Guard being unavailable in an emergency, reportedly at Pelosi's request...? It would seem Ms. Sebelius is less than an honest, circumspect, unbiased individual.....however, playing the "race card" which the Democrats seem to pull out of the deck every other day, is really trashy and low. If Obama loses it is because Socialism is a killer of all America stands for...it is a destroyer of Independence, a destroyer of individual initiative, a flat out attack on what makes this Country great....it is a policy of unilateral Welfare. That is something that many find objectionable. That will be the reason, not some bogus race factor.
If you want 4 more years of that, you are either a masochist, a traitor that hates america ...or theres something really wrong with you
If you vote due to other factors such as race, socialism etc, which are really excuses then you are behind the curve.
Ask yourself, whats in it for you?
Dont vote for negative reasons such as Muslim, color, wright etc...its not going to gain you and your family anything...
THINK and vote and also donate to Obama because you will get returns.
Girish Iyengar - Smart American
How will Obama cut the taxes for people making less than $250K per year when he wants to increase spending so much? If you tax the rich at 100%, there will be no more rich to tax.
Obviously names of prestigious law schools, degrees, class standing and GPA's impress you more than everyday dedication to the job, experience and common sense. Try using some in November.
Phil Graham, look him up, he called the US a nation of whiner, he said we were only going through a mental recession, the guy who wrote the deregulation legislation, the big corporate lobbyist, well that guy his is McCain's chief financial advisor. That's the guy I want to fix stuff; thats the experience I am looking for.
I don't fear palin, except that she will destroy our economy and cause world war 3/armageddon over her beliefs and ignorance. Thats why I fear her; intellectually I don't fear her, I am 10000% more qualified and more intelligent than she will ever be. No just because I graduated from a Ivy league undergrad and law schools with honors its because I know what the bush doctrine is and I have a degree in economics/business, political science and in law; most importantly I have a doctorate and I am 25 and she does not and she is 44. names of school mean nothing, what the school teaches you is what means something and Columbia teaches you slightly more than U of Idaho thats why its so hard to get in. Further, having a doctorate in law makes you slightly more qualified than having nothing. Class standing is important because it shows you how much the person learned. McCain finished at 796/800 therefore there are 795 more qualified people out there. A dog is dedicated to the job, heck they are man's best friend they can't be more dedicated to the take of getting something done but I would not trust the dog to run for president because of that dedication. Not to be crass but I had the opportunity to work with the mentally handicapped and they are the most dedicated people i have met, but still they can't be president.
The problem with you calling what I said "spin" is that I wasn't trying to spin, I stated facts each on can be verified by independent neutral sources if people actually took the time to read rather than looking at a person's race and making a decision. Maybe you should check everything I said above read a big then use some common sense as to who you should vote for.
Hopefully, it is not all democrats that choose to see only what they want and ignore the obvious. And can understand that fear and convenient statistics - recall the adage that statistics don't lie but liars tell statistics - don't explain away the natural disgust of losing a national election after lasting through a hard-fought primary against a woman, an adulterer, a poor excuse of an ex-mayor, and a mid-life crisis state governor. But maybe Messr's Gore and Kerry can console him (and you) after election day, 2008.
Dredging up old data is self-serving and feels good I suppose, but you lose your average reader with things he/she might not instantly recognize. In the future, try to help your publics see the present harm or danger posed instead of fear-mongering with generalities of race wars, religious crusades, KKK, invoking the name of Hitler etc that subconsciously sways public opinion against you as a hater and is a guaranteed turn-off.
Other than that, believe what you care to but try to present (spin) it a different way next time.
Maybe another man, another election, not this guy. And his wife! I am certainly not ready for that!!!
If Clarance Thomas would give up the Supreme Court job and run for president, would you vote for him?
If the answer is "NO", then you are a racist under YOUR own definition.
If the answer is "YES", then you are a racist under MY definition of the word.
McCain on the other hand, was born in Panama FACT. Federal law states: "Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States."8 USC 1403 This law took effect on August 4, 1937, one year after John McCain was born, albeit with retroactive effect, resulting in McCain being declared a U.S. citizen. However, the question as to whether or not he is a citizen from birth cannot be answered by this law because (1) it took effect after his birth and (2) it does not state that the person's citizenship was acquired at birth, only that they are a citizen by means of the law's establishment (and, hence, at the time the law takes effect). Indeed, the law in 1936 stated that all persons born to two US citizen parents outside the "limits and jurisdictions of the United States" are citizens at birth, but the problem is that the Panama Canal Zone was explicitly excluded. (8 U.S.C. 173 (1925): "The term 'United States' shall be construed to mean the United States, and any waters, territory, or other place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, except the Isthmian Canal Zone.") Hence the status of Mr. McCain's citizenship at birth nonetheless remains unsettled.
So for those who challenge Obama's citizenship should be careful about glass houses.
And to address your nonsense, Obama was born in 1961 hawaii became a state in 1959 so it doesn't matter about those born in Hawaii before it was a state. His mother was born in Kansas, are they not citizens too?
You realize the practice of law without a license is a federal crime right? Now you know why because reading what someone told you the constitution says is not enough to understand and be competent.
You fail to consider that Obama has spent 12 years at the federal and state levels. Of the 570 bills Obama has co-sponsored, 15 have become federal law. He has sponsored 823 bills. Does this qualify him?
What about Obama pushing through the Lobbying and Ethics Reform Act, the strongest ethics reform bill in decades? Or pushing through the strongest ethics reform act in his state, the gift ban act? Or how about pushing through a bipartisan bill making every earmark public knowledge? Does this qualify him?
Is this enough?
Palin and mccain are the real mavericks. the ones who have taken on the government. the usa isnt broke but the government is...OBAMA HAS FLAT OUT SAID HE WILL RAISE THE TAX WHICH WILL TURN AWAY INVESTING, NOTICE THAT THE STATES THAT HAVE ALL THE JOB LOSS, ARE BLUE STATES..THEY BEEN TAXED TO DEATH BY DEMOCRATIC GOVENORS...... so PUNK do some research then come back and make statements about your candidate
What promises has he gone back on in this election? State your case.
McCain/Palin haven't taken the government on. They are not reformers. You cannot be a reformer when you support 2 bridges to nowhere and only concede on one when its publicly criticized. Yeah, Palin is still supporting a billion dollar bridge project in Wasilla.
McCain doesnt even know where McCain stands.
Yeah, old Barry likes to mock folks with physical disabilities; that's lots of fun and gains lots of votes. Yeah, he is so fair he doesn't see any difference between Georgia and Russia. Yeah, he even said that John McCain is running a more ethical campaign than he is . . . oh, yeah, THAT IS WHY his staff hauls his teleprompter to RODEOS!!! Bar-rag is picking up the Joe Biden gaffe a day syndrome.
Let's see now, where were we . . . . . Oh, yeah, WHAT DID OBAMA DO WITH $885,000.00 that he got from F & F? What, Michelle spent it? What, OFF SHORE ACCOUNTS??? Oh, boy, he better hope that old fish-face spent it!!! IT BETTER NOT BE IN ANY OFF SHORE ACCOUNTS!!!!!
Now, to be fair (yes I know that FAIR is not a word that Lefties like to use, but Righties are very fair, so to be fair, let's ask WHAT DID JOHN McCAIN DO WITH THE $885,000.00 THAT HE GOT FROM F & F? Oh, gosh, he didn't get $885,000.00 from F & F? Gee whiz, what do we do now???
I KNOW, LET'S DEMAND THAT F & F GIVE THE EXACT SAME TO THE REPUBLICANS THAT THEY GAVE TO THE DEMOCRATS!!!
BY JOVE, THAT IS A CORKING IDEA!!!! HOW DO WE GET THE BALL ROLLING ON THIS ONE??? THE REPUBLICANS WILL BE SO GOSH DARN PLEASED!!! Good work, punk!
OBAMA GOT TO THE ILLINOIS STATE HOUSE IN JANUARY OF 1997.
HE STARTED IN DC IN 2005.
HAT MEANS HE HAS SPENT LESS THAN TEN YEARS ACTUALLY WORKING IN POLITICS (he LIED about Sarah Palin, she began in 1992 as an elected official, he started in 1997, and called her “new” to the scene.
THIS ALSO MEANS THAT HE HAD LESS THAN FIVE YEARS WHEN HE BEGAN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.
HE INTRODUCED ZERO, NONE, NADA, BILLS IN THE SENATE
HE HAS WRITTEN ZERO LEGISLATION.
ZERO OF HIS BILLS HAVE PASSED (except for a single housekeeping measure they GAVE HIM in May AFTER HE WAS ALREADY THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
HE HAD ZERO LEGISLATION TO HIS CREDIT WHEN HE WAS NOMINATED AND / OR RUNNING.
DO NOT LIE ABOUT THIS OR TRY TO PARSE FANCY WORDS.
HIS SIGNATURES ON OTHERS BILLS MEANS NOTHING!!! THAT IS A COURTESY. HE IS LIKE THE MAN WHO ALWAYS GOES GO DINNER BUT NEVER PICKS UP THE CHECK!!!
HE PUSHED THROUGH NOTHING! He is worthless in a floor fight. Have you ever seen him operate? He runs straight for the door. IOW, HE IS A CHICKEN AND MOST MEN KNOW IT!
I WILL DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU TO GIVE US A SINGLE NUMBER OF A SINGLE BILL THAT HE INTRODUCED DURING HIS TIME IN THE SENATE BEFORE HE RAN FOR THE DEMOCRAT TICKET!!!!!!!!!
JUST GIVE ME ONE!!!!!!!!!!
FORGET ABOUT THE ONES YOU CLAIM HE WAS PART OF BECAUSE THOSE ARE ALL LIES.
In fact, your jerk-off is so lazy he doesn’t even like to go to work, let alone do anything when he is there! Where is the number of any bill he wrote?? Just one!! Any one!!
If you knew anything at all about politics, you would know that ONE DAY as mayor beats TEN YEARS in the legislature!!!!!!
There is no use in whining about his being “qualified” because he is not. He could spend 100 years in the Senate and not be qualified. They are different jobs; don’t you get it?
He can claim that he twisted arms (not his job either) and he will still not be qualified!!!
It doesn’t matter if he pushed through a bill that cured cancer, he would still not be qualified.
The fact is that you do not understand the system WHICH IS WHY YOUR EXAMPLES ARE NOT RELEVANT. No, they are not enough. No they do not count.
Obama is a sad sack who got greedy and now he is in over his head. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO PEOPLE WHO ARE TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT THERE ARE THINGS THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW AND DOES NOT KNOW THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW.
Everyone knows he is in trouble EXCEPT for a few supporters who do not know how to read the signs. Your pathetic attempts to “cover for him” on web sites will never change the dynamics of the problem. HUBRIS IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. GREED IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. LACK OF MORAL FIBER IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS NON-TRADITIONAL UPBRINGING IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS LIES TO COVER HIS NON-TRADITIONAL UPBRINGING IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS MEAN MEAN MEAN WIFE IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS YEARS AT A BLACK LIBERATION CHURCH IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH JEREMIAH WRIGHT IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH ROBERT REZKO IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. H IS RELATIONSHIP WITH LOUIS FARRAKHAN IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS NEVER PASSING ANY LEGISLATION IS A HUGE PART OF THE PROBLEM. HIS BAD JUDGMENT (going after a VP candidate instead of McCain) (mocking folks with disabilities) (mocking a military record) (mocking a POW) ARE VERY MUCH PART OF HIS PROBLEMS. HIS INABILITY TO RELATE TO “REAL” AMERICANS (because he was raised in Indonesia) IS A VERY BIG PROBLEM. HIS LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF AMERICAN TRADITION IS PART OF THE PROBLEM. AND, WHAT HE DID TO HILLARY CLINTON (she is nothing to Obama and his nasty wife, BUT Hillary is the WIFE of a very popular president; if Obama KNEW WHAT HE NEEDED TO KNOW ABOUT AMERICAN TRADITION AND ABOUT THE TRADITIONS OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, HE WOULD NOT HAVE TREATED HILLARY SO BADLY), IS VERY MUCH PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Your point?
For a Senator or Congressman to "sponsor" a bill does not mean that they authored the bills or even did anything to push the bill through their respective house. It simply means that they put their name on the bill to supposedly give it greater credibility when they vote on it. He may or may not have been given a few minutes on the floor to make a short supportive speech or something like that. It means very little other than to pad a politicians resume' for those who are ignorant enough to think that it really means something.
Obama, being a novice, needed to associate himself with as many bills as possible to give the appearance that he is really working hard and "fighting" for this cause or that cause. In reality, it's bogus. It is done, for the most part, to advance one's political carrier, which is what B. O. is all about. I know this is true of a lot of politicians but, in the brief time he has been in politics, how much of that time has been spent running for a higher public office and how much time has actually been spent doing the job he has been elected to do. I think that the time he has spent campaigning is grossly disproportionate to his work effort, even in relation to other politicians.
Senator McCain has been in the game for a long time and doesn't need any of that pseudo-credibility and knows that "sonsoring" bills authored by othermen is nothing but a bunch of window dressing. That is why he has "sponsored" so many fewer bills. He gains nothing by it. It is worthwhile to "sponsor" a bill to give it credibility for a vote, but it is not a resume's enhancer (or it shouldn't be considered as such).
don't claim to know Obama's intentions in sponsoring and/or
co-sponsoring bills and I don't think you can honestly claim the same
either.
A person's record is just one of the many factors we should consider
when throwing our support behind a candidate. In my opinion, being in
the senate and doing little to nothing is worse then being there and
over actively participating.
The argument could be made for either side I suppose and in the end it's
up to the individual interpretation. I choose to believe in Obama. You
don't.
I will acknowledge my cynicism. I think cynicism is warranted in light of the condition of the American political scene today. It seems that the overall tone of politics in Washington is "hatred" rather than philosophical disagreement. Set aside the hatred and the philosophical disagreement is so wide that Republicans and Democrats can agree on almost nothing and the rare ocasions on which they do "seem" to agree always have some nefarious ulterior motive involved.
Both parties are guilty of it but, in my view, the democratic party and its leadership have literally "written the book" on that kind of politics for quite a while. A long with that, they have adopted a political philospohy that is changing America into a country that I don't think Washington, Jefferson, or Lincoln would even recognize if they were alive today.
American is becoming a divided country, 1.5 million children are being aborted every year in favor of blatant and uncontrolled immorality and the rejection of simple, common decency. Homosexuality and pornography of the most vile sort are becoming part of the fabric of our society and defended, primarily by democrats, as being acceptible and even right. The schools and universities in this country are indoctrination centers for leftist philosophy and the majority of students come out of those schools ilequipped to think critically about much of anything other that maneuvering "Mario" through to the next level, the proper use of a condom, or how to handle single parenthood at 15.
Nearly 20 million people are living in this country illegally and there are few people in the government who seem to really believe that there is anything wrong with it inspite of the obvious list of negative consequences that this is causing all over the country.
We are in the middle of a culture war, a war we didn't start, didn't ask for, and must win, with radical Islam that involves the death of thousands of Americans and the country cannot set aside partisan politics even in this extremely critical time, in order to win this war. Democratic politicians, in order to gain political advantage, have undermined virtually every aspect of the war although they know the war is legitimate and necessary because they vote to fund it.
Even in this banking crisis, the political posturing to win an election is going to take precedence over finding a solution to it. In fact, the very reason it happened is because political advantage is the priority, not the welfare of the country.
This country is becoming something that is hard to defend and I put about 90% of the blame for that, at least in the political sense, squarely on the shoulders of the Democratic party for having adopted Modern Liberalism and Moral relativism as their underlying foundation.
Barack Obama is the "poster child" for who and what they are and if you like this guy, I really think that you are an ignoramous - there really isn't anything about this guy, other than an image, that is of any substance. He simply hasn't lived a life that indicates any degree of depth and yet millions of Americans admire him - am I cynical? - you bet.
IN FACT, THE RACE ARGUMENT FALLS FLAT ON ITS FACE WHEN THE PERSON IN QUESTION IS A CONSERVATIVE!!!
Now, that answer makes the LEFTISTS ANGRY!! Do you know their typical (canned) response? It is very very insulting! They call conservative blacks UNCLE TOM!! Remember what they did to Clarence Thomas?? He called his treatment by DEMOCRAT ELECTED OFFICIALS (not some thugs down at a corner) as a "HIGH TECH LYNCHING!”
You see, Clarence Thomas KNOWS HISTORY and he knew that the KKK was formed by the Democrats and that it was the DEMOCRATS who LYNCHED BLACKS!!! And that it was DEMOCRAT SHERIFFS WHO TOOK AFTER BLACKS with FIRE HOSES, BASEBALL BATS, and DOGS!! He knew that the DEMOCRATS PASSED LAWS FORCING SEGREGATION!!
He knew that Republicans HAVE ALWAYS BEEN FRIENDS TO BLACKS AND ALL MINORITIES. He knows (a) the history of the Republican Party, (b) their record of VOTING AND DEMONSTRATING FOR CIVIL RIGHTS! and (c) the NUMBER ONE PREMISE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WHICH IS RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL.
If you read history, and truly study it, you know that whenever the Democrats start to lose anything, they turn around and blame the Republicans. It was REPUBLICANS WHO WENT TO WAR AGAINST SLAVERY, AND REPUBLICANS WHO STOPPED SLAVERY, AND REPUBLICANS WHO PASSED CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION IN THE 1960's (to STOP the Democrats from imposing poll taxes, and literacy tests, to stop the blacks from voting).
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT EISENHOWER SENT FEDERAL TROOPS TO INTEGRATE THE SCHOOLS WHILE DEMOCRAT SENATOR ROBERT BYRD IS STILL A MEMBER OF THE KKK AND HOLDS THE EXALTED POST OF GRAND KLEAGLE!!
WITH MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE IN FULL SIGHT, THE DEMOCRATS STILL CALL THE REPUBLICANS RACISTS!! (There is little doubt that the American people will ever be told the truth; Democrats are vicious liars; I can only imagine their real feelings about racists; Senator Byrd has never been confronted about his ugly RACIST side. Would a Republican be allowed to sit in the Senate with that title?
THERE IS FULL EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRAT RACISM THAT CAN BE PROVEN IN ANY COURT OF LAW (1) Civil War (2) KKK (3) Democrats passing segregation legislation 4) Democrat sheriffs that punished blacks (5) Democrat legislation for poll taxes (6) Democrat legislation for literacy tests and many others. THE PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE IS ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE; but the Democrats continue their lies. [They must, or their house of cards will fall down.]
FACTS ARE FACTS; THEY CANNOT BE DENIED.
Martin Luther King was a Republican. Until WWI and WWII and industrial changes; almost all blacks were Republicans. THE ONLY BLACK DEMOCRATS WERE THOSE WHO HAD OWNERS WHO MADE CERTAIN THEY STAYED ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE!
I could cry when I think of what the Democrats have done to the black family and to black owned businesses. It is truly sickening, from financial, emotional, mental, and spiritual aspects, Democrats should be ashamed, but they aren't. The more they are found out, the more they scream and point and point and scream. Truly, I do not know how they can sleep at night.
Just look at what they are doing to our FIRST FEMALE candidate! But, she will have the votes BECAUSE SHE IS A CONSERVATIVE!!!!!!
REPUBLICANS WILL NEVER CONSIDER A DEMOCRAT AND VERY FEW INDEPENDENTS WILL CONSIDER A MARXIST SOCIALIST LIKE OBAMA!
WHERE DID OBAMA THINK HIS VOTES WERE GOING TO COME FROM, BASED ON HIS HISTORY OF SOCIALISM AND HAVING THE SECOND TO WORST VOTING RECORD IN THE SENATE?
HOW DID GOV SIB. AND NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID AND HOWARD DEAN THINK THEY WERE GOING TO COVER THAT UP???
THEY ARE DOING A GREAT JOB OF COVERING HIS INCOMPETENCE BUT HOW TO COVER HIS SOCIALIST VOTING THAT IS READILY AVAILABLE???
For someone who doesn't seem to like or respect black people, you have a pretty good grasp on the challenges they've have to face from racist society, regardless of what party they were associated with. If your talking about the South, just replace "Democrat" with "white" and you'd see the real picture.
I'm actually from the South, so I've seen what you're talking about first-hand. I've seen much more violent racism--like the kind you're espousing--in Pennsylvania and especially Idaho, where Palin is actually from and where Mark Furman has a vacation home. It's like White Supremisist Disneyland.
Just don't go into the same oublic bathroom as their senator, Larry Craig!!