-
Website
http://iowaindependent.com/ -
Original page
http://iowaindependent.com/3950/king-marriage-debate-will-mobilize-iowans-for-gop -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
bill4321
19 comments · 25 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 3 points
-
Shane Vander Hart
21 comments · 1 points
-
W Scott Lincoln
35 comments · 4 points
-
Netter
30 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Lunchtime Links
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Narcisse to run for governor
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Gross a polarizing figure for Iowa GOP
3 days ago · 3 comments
-
Grassley helped spread ‘Lie of the Year’
3 days ago · 2 comments
-
Health care reform, earmark edition
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
Lunchtime Links
I'm paying more than $4 a gallon for gas.
What I spend at the grocery store keeps rising like a hot air balloon on a summer day.
I am one layoff away from losing health insurance and access to medical care.
Some of my neighbors still have sons and daughters in Iraq more than five years after the invasion at the cost of billions of dollars.
We don't dare get too uppity with the Russians over invading Georgia or with the Chinese over enabling genocide in the Sudan, because they are our bankers now, and if they call the loan we're in deep doo.
Come to think of it, the prospect of gay people kissing really is the most important issue we could talk about in this election. Thank heaven we have a congressman who understands that, and whose only legislative accomplishment is a bill underscoring the importance of Christmas to Christians.
Neither DOMA nor the efforts to overturn/repeal DOMA have any authority whatsoever with regard to same-sex marriages in churches. DOMA can only forbid same-sex marriages from being recognized by the state, and its repeal would only permit same-sex marriages to be recognized by the state.
Under DOMA, some churches nevertheless already do recognize same-sex marriages, and DOMA can't forbid that. If DOMA was repealed, some churches would still refuse to recognize same-sex marriages, and state or federal law can't force them to recognize those marriages.
King's lumping the two together, as if they weren't completely severable concepts, is yet another example of his chronically sloppy thinking on almost any issue he addresses. It's also more particularly an example of his chronic unwillingness to recognize the crucial constitutional distinction between church and state.
The only thing he has left is fear tactics... kinda sad.